Icy Gull
Back on the rollercoaster
- Jul 5, 2003
- 72,015
He had surgery on it, which the club told us.
Did they say for what?
I'd also be interested to know when the club were aware that Sidwell needed a back operation.
He had surgery on it, which the club told us.
Did they say for what?
I'd also be interested to know when the club were aware that Sidwell needed a back operation.
Calf injury. I googled it and found at least four press references to Sam Baldock, calf surgery, not just the Argus.
I followed your lead and am shocked to see he has been back in part training since 09 August, can't be long now then. I now know " a little longer" means in excess of two months in Hughton speak, good to know for the future
.
I'm pretty sure I read Baldock's back will give out sometime in October, but I'm not sure which year.
For someone so well versed in "Hughton speak" Icy, you do seem to miss a lot of what he says on a weekly, sometimes daily, basis about our current injuries. or as you like to describe them "injuries".
Sorry Chailey CH is so incredibly vague about injuries that I don't tend to take much notice of his updates. .
If he has a torn calf why didn't the club tell us? Maybe they have but I don't recall any talk of a fairly serious injury which presumably it is.
except when you inexplicably seem to want more of them.
Sorry Chailey CH is so incredibly vague about injuries that I don't tend to take much notice of his updates. In my world "a little longer" is not more than two months, and let's be honest, there is absolutely no sign of a Baldock come back so it's likely to stretch to over three months. It would have been good to know he was going to be out for that long when he had surgery.
Maybe he was not saying much because our inability to land strikers would have seemed worse if we'd known Baldock was going to be out for a large chunk of the season.
Did hear that Baldock is suffering as much mentally with the injuries as physically. Vicente-esque perhaps. Sometimes players after significant injuries just never feel right, or mentally don't recover. Could explain why we're not getting specific updates.
Did hear that Baldock is suffering as much mentally with the injuries as physically. Vicente-esque perhaps. Sometimes players after significant injuries just never feel right, or mentally don't recover. Could explain why we're not getting specific updates.
Did hear that Baldock is suffering as much mentally with the injuries as physically. Vicente-esque perhaps. Sometimes players after significant injuries just never feel right, or mentally don't recover. Could explain why we're not getting specific updates.
I’ve not heard that but I understand that Stephens had the same during his recovery
Everything the medical team could test suggested he was in good shape and pain free yet he kept breaking down. I think there may have been some concern that he might not recover from it at all at one stage.
Bollox
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Bollox
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
"Did hear that" - where ?
I’ve not heard that but I understand that Stephens had the same during his recovery
Everything the medical team could test suggested he was in good shape and pain free yet he kept breaking down. I think there may have been some concern that he might not recover from it at all at one stage.
Had it been a source of any note from the club, or press, I would have referenced that. In saying 'did hear that', it was literally from hearing that from someone else who may well be talking bollox, but may well have not been. Happy for you to take it with a pinch of salt that an unqualified NSC post deserves.
Who knows, and I am certainly not ITK, so to speak, but it does ring true to some degree in where we are with Sam, and where he might be with his build up of injuries.
To summarise, there's been absolutely no adverse information on Baldock's pychological state.