rogersix
Well-known member
- Jan 18, 2014
- 8,232
Was it? Freezing?As it was freezing cold outside and I was warm in the car, I did.
Was it? Freezing?As it was freezing cold outside and I was warm in the car, I did.
Was it? Freezing?
This incident is covered well here.I’m still laughing at the dear old lady who wandered up to Osbourne and his new wife and threw some orange confetti. Everyone was throwing confetti and I’m not sure Osborne noticed. They hardly broke stride and his wife just glanced over her shoulder. Disrupted their special day? Ridiculous over reaction but no more than you would expect. Typical distraction.
Have you seen the lorry driver attempting to drive over them?seen a couple of videos on twitter from Germany. public are a bit more physical, dragging protestors off the roads.
This government won't engage with them. More's to the point, they will continue to increase carbon emissions, because that's what they've done, as is the case with the four previous iterations.Why should the government engage with them?
They are no more legitimate than any other fringe protest movement.
Why shouldn't they?Why should the government engage with them?
They are no more legitimate than any other fringe protest movement.
Rain and heavy winds here. Typical British summer...very little actual sun. I'm not jealous at allI’m off to Greece in 2 weeks, the weather looks absolutely superb! Keep up the good work motorists and other burners of fossil fuels.
Is it me or are 'trust fund babies' getting older these days?
Why shouldn't they?
When it's a 'fringe group' that represents something that affects the entire world, then yes, yes it should. Bollocks to a mandate, we're taking about protecting our planet for future generations - not some religious or political points-scoring exercise!Because they are a fringe group.
Should the government engage with other fringe groups who want to significantly alter society without public mandate (Animal Liberation Front, Britain First, any extremist religious groups etc)?
When it's a 'fringe group' that represents something that affects the entire world, then yes, yes it should. Bollocks to a mandate, we're taking about protecting our planet for future generations - not some religious or political points-scoring exercise!
I find it baffling in some ways that, given the Albion's history, some people on here are so opposed to groups protesting against things that are 'wrong' and fighting for a solution.
How many other people could afford to buy themselves a nice BMW i3 rather than a petrol or diesel car?
No good saying them move needs to be now, given that most cannot make that move for the short-term.
Because for many people JSO/ExReb were getting preferential treatment by the police and even the mainstream media (DM aside), the language viewed is often sympathetic. It's a very middle-class movement, sponsored by some murky people. They make pointless protests that just annoy your average working person. They're not helping the problem we all need to solve with the climate crisis, if anything they have set the emergency back decades.When it's a 'fringe group' that represents something that affects the entire world, then yes, yes it should. Bollocks to a mandate, we're taking about protecting our planet for future generations - not some religious or political points-scoring exercise!
I find it baffling in some ways that, given the Albion's history, some people on here are so opposed to groups protesting against things that are 'wrong' and fighting for a solution.
So, who would make the decision on such matters?Many frindge groups think they campaign for things that effect the whole world.
As for protecting our planet for future generations, rather than import our gas and oil needs, why not supply and refine our own during the transition to nuclear and renewables? It doesn’t equate the increased FF use, merely more reliable supply and less reliance on OPEC, Russia etc.
Norway, USA and Gulf States continue to expand drilling. Why shouldn’t we?
Ah the classic 'That's not the right way to protest' line. In response to EVERY form of protestBecause for many people JSO/ExReb were getting preferential treatment by the police and even the mainstream media (DM aside), the language viewed is often sympathetic. It's a very middle-class movement, sponsored by some murky people. They make pointless protests that just annoy your average working person. They're not helping the problem we all need to solve with the climate crisis, if anything they have set the emergency back decades.
There does seem to be a notable difference between the eco-movements of the 80's and 90's to the pointless gaslighting protests we have now. The sad thing is these delusional JSO plonkers really do think they are changing the world. It's basically posh twats patting themselves on the back.
So, who would make the decision on such matters?
That'd be the government, then. Who JSO are trying to engage with...
There certainly isn't with the current regime, no!Elected governments make decisions based on manfiesto promises.
Not climate change cults.
There is no reasoning with groups like Just Stop Oil.