- Thread starter
- #1,941
Presumably if the striking miners had managed to keep the mines open, JSO would have been causing havoc to get them closed.People taking actions and initiatives for a better world... like miners going on a strike, suffragettes bombing to make their point because words werent enough, people violently protesting tyrannical governments, or fans invading pitches to protest poor owners... always a nuisance to someone, but what would the world look like without it?
Yes. But different era, different issues being fought and a different world. Not that difficult to work out.Presumably if the striking miners had managed to keep the mines open, JSO would have been causing havoc to get them closed.
Head over to The Shed End then, he popular there!I miss (‘Now and Then’!) Swansman’s contributions to this forum - although his views on some things were a bit ‘out there’ (and in a few latter posts on a specific issue, far less than acceptable) - overall, I largely agreed with what he had to say and for one enjoyed his intelligent discourse on a wide diversity of stuff, knowledge of football and very unique perspectives.
I miss (‘Now and Then’!) Swansman’s contributions to this forum - although his views on some things were a bit ‘out there’ (and in a few latter posts on a specific issue, far less than acceptable) - overall, I largely agreed with what he had to say and for one enjoyed his intelligent discourse on a wide diversity of stuff, knowledge of football and very unique perspectives.
This is about where I am at, I find their tactics whilst in the first few instnces it was great and bought attention to the oil / sea licences issue that the government swept under the carpet whilst other topics were in the news. But now they are just harming regular people and that I can't abide, they seem childish and petulant at best as they are not listening to people who want to support their cause, but can't align with their tactics.I’m still pro JSO’s aims, but find their tactics mixed. I’ve seen/heard a lot less coverage of them recently, suggesting that the media have decided not to give to the oxygen of publicity.
Eh? The media absolutely love the antics of JSO, as you'll have noticed. No, I think they've just migrated to the pro-Palestine protests as it's got a bit wet and chilly for sitting in the road.Speaking of which, I’m still pro JSO’s aims, but find their tactics mixed. I’ve seen/heard a lot less coverage of them recently, suggesting that the media have decided not to give to the oxygen of publicity.
It’s more to do with their funding being pulled by an influential and wealthy backer.Eh? The media absolutely love the antics of JSO, as you'll have noticed. No, I think they've just migrated to the pro-Palestine protests as it's got a bit wet and chilly for sitting in the road.
And I agree with this - I think most of them do though and are prepared to go to court or prison to pay the priceI agree with this. But if you takes such action you have to also accept the consequences of your actions, whether that’s the courts if you break the law or direct action back at you if you have impacted other citizens.
Completely agree. We must always protect the right to express our views and protest. Its the definition of "peaceful" which is where peoples views diverge. Sitting on a road doing nothing is obviously peaceful, but if you are blocking roads, emergency vehicles, trains trying to get to power stations, damaging private property, and you've done it 20, 30 , 40 times, there comes a point where you are not peaceful to my mind, you're a pain in the arse and affecting the ordinary order of society.When any State however (and we are not there yet!) starts indiscriminately jailing people for peaceful political activism - it is necessary to take a long hard look at the degree to which jailing political activists is being used as a tool of oppression as it is in many parts of the world - this issue is CC and we are lucky we still have freedom to protest but it is a lot more restricted than it used to be and one day, we all might want to protest against a government policy that has a deeply negative impact on our lives but find our ability to do so has all but diminished. We can disagree with the tactics, even disagree with the POV but disagree with the right to protest, I believe we must not.
This is funny:
www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-67312280.amp
“Ms Gribbin requested that the trial take place at the end of February as she will be away.
Judge Snow said: "I am afraid I am not going to wait for you to get back from India."
He added: "If you have miss out things, you have to miss out on things."”
So she asked the judge to delay her trial so she could fly to India? This is the same woman who described herself “the same as Jean Valjean”.
Well done Judge Snow.
It’s more to do with their funding being pulled by an influential and wealthy backer.
His analysis that the Tories (supported by the rabid right wing press) had managed to paint JSO as public enemy No.1 to the intellectually weakest in our society has meant that they have all but reversed critical carbon emission reducing environmentalist policies actively trashing their climate change election promises whilst rewarding chums and donors with lucrative new oil field exploration and production contracts.
This is exactly the opposite of what JSO wanted.
They’ll be back under the Labour government in a year or so. Hopefully, there are enough sensible green policies in their manifesto to dissuade JSO from going after the front pages again.