No need to change the law , just tell the OB to stay in the canteenThe new laws are designed to protect the corrupt Tory government and their business chums.
They’re sold as protecting you from the likes of JSO.
No need to change the law , just tell the OB to stay in the canteenThe new laws are designed to protect the corrupt Tory government and their business chums.
They’re sold as protecting you from the likes of JSO.
Twat...Someone’s been reading the Daily Mail too much!
A post full of absolute hate, people would think you’re talking about Putin rather than someone trying to save the world. Have a word with yourself.
The right to protest is the cornerstone of any democracy and goes to the heart of our fundamental freedoms and civil liberties.Shame it didn't break his f***ing entitled neck...
i saw Starmer support the objective of JSO, to stop further licences on oil and gas exploration. given it's a certainty he'll be next PM, isn't further protesting unnecessay?
Not wanting to sidetrack the thread topic into a discussion of strike action by healthcare workers and teachers (which I wholeheartedly support btw) - but the fact that ‘enraged’ from Tonbridge is focussing on this to discredit JSO seems very selective imo - I waited 90 minutes for an emergency ambulance last week (for sepsis), not because it was delayed in traffic due to protests about CC but because lack of funding and industrial action by key workers is still causing backlogs & ambulance queues at A&E etc - JSO has caused nothing like the same delays/interference with emergency healthcare or indeed their roadblocks caused the same amount of work days lost to parents due to school strikes yet the stakes (global climate security) at which billions of lives are at risk from the impact of anthropogenic causes of CC are just as high, if not higher.In the incidents listed, a fire engine was let through a protest to an emergency, and an ambulance that didn't have it's lights or siren on was held up in traffic.
Considering how much is made of the delaying emergency services argument I was expecting more.
If I've missed other incidences buried further up in the thread or elsewhere then I'm happy to have them pointed out to me.
it's about the UK stopping.Is every other nation ending oil and gas exploration or is the UK expected to sacrifice alone?
it's just england and walesIs every other nation ending oil and gas exploration or is the UK expected to sacrifice alone?
You get thrown in jail for saying you like being English.It’s all gone a bit bear pittish.
This reminds me of me saying once “actually, I quite like being English” in response to lots of people slagging our country, which in turn empowered all the nutters to piggyback on my comment as if I am some kind of skinhead ultra-nationalist nutter. I’m not. I’m mixed race. I love my country.
Which in turn led to lots of people saying “WHY do you love your country, unfair distribution of wealth, poor cuisine etc etc”.
Not liking JSO’s methods doesn’t automatically make me a Tory-loving little Englander gammon.
Most of the middle ground are the same.
Cut out the abuse please.Twat...
That’s what a cabbie told me; well he didn’t really say that, it’s a conceit for comedic purposes. But he would have said thatYou get thrown in jail for saying you like being English.
They're not called Just Stop Oil in BritainBritain accounts for less than 2% 0f global emissions....you do realise that don't you ...?? Asia , China , USA and Russia are the major offenders ....Joylon and Tarquin throwing tomato soup at ambulances is a totally futile display of misplaced energy.
yeah, 60,000 protesters - not a peep. 40,000 asylum seekers - 24/7 news coverage.I am not going to pretend I wouldn't be pissed off if I had somewhere to be and JSO blocked the road, but I really do wonder what the alternative to direct action should be? As Chris Packham pointed out in that video above, he attended an anti-fossil fuel rally with 60,000 others and it wasn't even mentioned in any printed or visual media except a few inches in The Times. Yet a few people throw some powder over a snooker table and suddenly there is a discussion to be had.
If you're not at least sympathetic to the direct protestors than I'm glad you weren't around when our football club needed saving, because that wasn't achieved by a handful of strongly worded letters to the Albion board at the time, I can tell you.
what so Tarquin has the right to hurl comestibles at emergency vehicles to stop third world countries becoming richer..? its just not going to happen is it ..(rhetorical) its f***ing futile , the western world will slam the brakes on and reconfigure whilst the brown water economies forge forward with fossil fuels and when their countries flood we will be guilt tripped into donating to charity to help them out but most of that money will go on admin....ffsThey're not called Just Stop Oil in Britain
see my other reply ....third world countries are demanding their turn at prosperity , try stopping that , it ain't happening.....imho.We might as well all give up doing anything, then. Why even bother to vote....just one vote isn't going to change anything!
its a shame people don't rise up against being rinsed by banks , fuel and food supply corporation , profits for these entities are at record levels bank profits up 15% relative to the late 80's ...we are all being rinsed.yeah, 60,000 protesters - not a peep. 40,000 asylum seekers - 24/7 news coverage.
And the media portray the protestors as enemies of the people with journalists attacking them in a similar style to workers on strike to turn the public against them. Shame not more people rise above rather than follow the narrative