Just as easily, the JDs could agree to further talks - and actually take a bit of time to summarise their grievances in a logical manner. It's very much a two-way street on this one, IMHO.
I think the BMA leadership has been poor, but the undercurrent of dissatisfaction upon regular JDs, who, let's be honest, are not by nature militant, is a genuine concern.
I'm a union member for another union and to be honest we end up with the leaders we deserve, mostly through apathy. They don't tend to be the smartest, the most articulate, or reflect the views of the majority, but then the same could be said of our politicians.
The BMA recommended the deal, the members voted against it.