They had no shots at all in the second halfIn his 7 mins on the pitch against West Ham he had as many shots on target as they had in the entire game. In fact he'd only been on the pitch about 30 seconds when he matched them.
They had no shots at all in the second halfIn his 7 mins on the pitch against West Ham he had as many shots on target as they had in the entire game. In fact he'd only been on the pitch about 30 seconds when he matched them.
Agree, think he'll be off on loan. He's getting some game time now but if the club brings in a replacement for Trossard, swaps Undav for a more competitive second/third CF, Enciso will struggle to get enough game time. A year on loan in a good club/league (preferably one of the top 5 leagues) would probably be great for him.I really think a season on loan next season is the best for him next. Clearly an incredible, raw talent, but I think playing week in week out, learning the discipline he'll need to really be effective for us is absolutely what he needs. Obviously he's learning a lot in training but nothing will replicate match practice. In a way he needs a few bollockings, Lallana has already hinted at that, and he'll certainly learn if some gnarly older pros demand more from his decision making in a game environment consistently. Assuming Adringa gets a work permit (maybe he already has?) he seems much more useful off the bench or in reserve next season.
As exciting as he was against a floored and flawed West Ham, he was way off just the week before at Stoke.
I don’t get why so many NSchatters are negative about loans. It was the same with Connolly a few years ago. It’s not a failure or sleight on a player’s talent, it’s a positive development step.
Enciso would need to reach Mitoma level pretty quickly to justify not going on loan from Brighton. Is that likely? Well, he does produce the occasional piece of quality but the consistency and team awareness are weaker than his team mates.
Six months at Union should do it. That didn’t work out too badly for Mitoma.
I’m not against loans and feel they fall into several categories. 1. For those on the way out (eg Connolly, Andone, Duffy) 2. Youngsters needing experience of senior football (all our Development squad) 3. Foreigners awaiting work permit or needing to adapt to English/European style football (Mitoma, Koslowski etc). I don’t think Enciso now falls into any of these. He is already an integral part of our squad, is a full International, and can hold his own in PL games. This is why I think a loan is not appropriate for him. I might be proved wrong by the club, but at the moment I think it’s unlikely.I don’t get why so many NSchatters are negative about loans. It was the same with Connolly a few years ago. It’s not a failure or sleight on a player’s talent, it’s a positive development step.
Enciso would need to reach Mitoma level pretty quickly to justify not going on loan from Brighton. Is that likely? Well, he does produce the occasional piece of quality but the consistency and team awareness are weaker than his team mates.
Six months at Union should do it. That didn’t work out too badly for Mitoma.
I think he offers something the others don't which is he knows how to shoot on sight. very unlucky against WHUFC as keeper pulled off a very good save. Some comments are about his lack of speed, not sure how going on loan will improve that. I think a lot will depend on where we end up and its possible we might want to keep a lot of 'first team players' around. I think it would be best to come back to this thread at the end of the season. Note it was this time last year (nearly) when Caicedo came back from a bad loan and has been a revelation.I don’t get why so many NSchatters are negative about loans. It was the same with Connolly a few years ago. It’s not a failure or sleight on a player’s talent, it’s a positive development step.
Enciso would need to reach Mitoma level pretty quickly to justify not going on loan from Brighton. Is that likely? Well, he does produce the occasional piece of quality but the consistency and team awareness are weaker than his team mates.
Six months at Union should do it. That didn’t work out too badly for Mitoma.
Ferguson? He’s 9 months YOUNGER than Enciso.IMO, 6 months in the gym would be better than a loan. Mac said how important that was for him when he came to Brighton. This lad has the inbred technique and eye to be an outstanding player, but he lacks physicality; I was worried we would get a strong gust of wind on Saturday, Compare him to Ferguson who is only a year or so older- yes, I know different style of player but anyone has to be able to put it about a bit in PL.
But Mitoma and Adringa (and others) went straight out on loan. Enciso is getting game time here so by the end of the season he might have enough on the clock to say fukk that.USG. Good enough for Mitoma, good enough for Adringa, good enough for Enciso.
OK, so supports my point even more.Ferguson? He’s 9 months YOUNGER than Enciso.
He's already bulked up a bit and I think it's hindering him as he hasn't adapted his running style for being a bit bigger.IMO, 6 months in the gym would be better than a loan. Mac said how important that was for him when he came to Brighton. This lad has the inbred technique and eye to be an outstanding player, but he lacks physicality; I was worried we would get a strong gust of wind on Saturday, Compare him to Ferguson who is only a year or so older- yes, I know different style of player but anyone has to be able to put it about a bit in PL.