ManOfSussex
We wunt be druv
absolutely. however politicians dont normally announce "we're war-gaming our policies being rejected", because they have faith in their policy. its not that they are war-gaming thats odd, its the fact they are telling people about this particular one that is. if they were playing through consequence of policy as you suggest, the obvious reaction might be to change policy, but it isn't. hence an alternative conclusion.
Perhaps. What McDonnell actually said was this:
What if there is a run on the pound? What happens if there is this concept of capital flight? I don’t think there will be but you never know so we’ve got to scenario-plan for that. People want to know we are ready and they want to know we have got a response to anything that could happen. If we can demonstrate that, that will calm things down.
New Labour in 1997 had various scenario planning models too. It would be prudent for any opposition looking to win power and initiate a change of office to do the same. Labour acknowledge they need to provide assurance on their policies - policies some see as different, some see as very radical, but these are radical times we live in now. New Labour has been very unwell for some time, was moved to intensive care after the Brexit vote last year and the life support machine was switched off after the general election this year. Perhaps Labour will win the next election whenever it comes, perhaps they wont - if they do it was Conservative, Brexit voters such as yourself, that didn't do what that nice Mr Cameron asked, that also contributed to making it all happen.