Agree , FFP is a dead duck because the FL/FA will not have the guts to target a big club. More likely they will pick on some poor 2nd division team
The rules are different in L2
Agree , FFP is a dead duck because the FL/FA will not have the guts to target a big club. More likely they will pick on some poor 2nd division team
Who says we're going to include depreciation of the stadium in our P&L?The losses were over £9 million last year and that was with no depreciation on the stadium.
Well take off Buckley, CMS, Vicente (who I assume were all included in the £9m loss), and take off Noone, whom we sold.Add that on, along with the signings of PIG, Bruno, Crofts, Ulloa, Bridge, Hammond and Upson
I think you mean take off - whatever League One commercial deals we still had, they'd be less than we had the year before - so the change in commercial deals, compared to the previous year, will be a positive one.add in that we were still winding down some League One commercial deals
Yep, that helps too.revenue is up about £1.5 million for the season from higher attendances.
Who says we're going to include depreciation of the stadium in our P&L?
Well take off Buckley, CMS, Vicente (who I assume were all included in the £9m loss), and take off Noone, whom we sold.
I think you mean take off - whatever League One commercial deals we still had, they'd be less than we had the year before - so the change in commercial deals, compared to the previous year, will be a positive one.
Yep, that helps too.
Agree with you SE20,but IF all clubs had that written in their contracts the agents would not be able to dictate the terms..How many players will sign a contract with a relegation clause in it ?
The players and agents have the upper hand unfortunately .
Agree with you SE20,but IF all clubs had that written in their contracts the agents would not be able to dictate the terms..
Agree with you SE20,but IF all clubs had that written in their contracts the agents would not be able to dictate the terms..
Barber took on many costs that couldn't be changed. A great example.
Poyet spent £3.25m on CMS. Under mandatory accounting rules, that fee has to be amortised over the length of the contract. Say 4 years, that's a £812,500 hit to the profit and loss account annually.
Then if his wages were £12,000 per week, add 13.8% employers national insurance and multiply by 52 weeks, and that gives £710,000 payroll costs on CMS per annum.
A grand total of £1.5m per each set of annual accounts within payroll costs, for just one player!
A chief exec joining after such transfers has no scope to alter the effect of this, even years later on the accounts.
You can see how the losses got out of control under Poyet, as TB generously and personally backed him. With FL FFP arriving, Poyet started paving the way for his exit with the interest in the Reading job and intermittent whinging.
Again I am sorry that I am not more financially astute, but surely Barber last year would have been aware of these facts before saying he would be working to reduce the £8mill year on year debt, but now we are hearing that the debts may have gone through the roof. So again I ask, if so is he failing in his promises?
No, FFP losses and accounting ones are based on different numbers.
I am really lost now . So are you saying the club can lose more money, but he can succeed within FFP?
Well thanks for the replies, I think I will just give up on trying to understand it all.Yes.
I'm only guessing on the numbers too, albeit starting with last years figures, and may (not for the first time) end up with major egg on face.
Barber took on many costs that couldn't be changed. A great example.
Poyet spent £3.25m on CMS. Under mandatory accounting rules, that fee has to be amortised over the length of the contract. Say 4 years, that's a £812,500 hit to the profit and loss account annually.
Then if his wages were £12,000 per week, add 13.8% employers national insurance and multiply by 52 weeks, and that gives £710,000 payroll costs on CMS per annum.
A grand total of £1.5m per each set of annual accounts within payroll costs, for just one player!
A chief exec joining after such transfers has no scope to alter the effect of this, even years later on the accounts.
You can see how the losses got out of control under Poyet, as TB generously and personally backed him. With FL FFP arriving, Poyet started paving the way for his exit with the interest in the Reading job and intermittent whinging.
Only asking, but have the club definitely stated/indicated that the 2012/13 and 2013/14 audited losses will show an increase year-on-year?
Until this thread, I thought they were steady high losses for 2011/12 and 2012/13 (the latter not published yet), and should show a fall for 2013/14 due to measures taken eg transport, change of caterers, redundancies, and Poyet was not allowed to blow so much on wages & transfers.
Poyet spent £3.25m on CMS
Shall I separate the posts about FFP in to a new thread?
Yes.
I'm only guessing on the numbers too, albeit starting with last years figures, and may (not for the first time) end up with major egg on face.