oneillco
Well-known member
- Feb 13, 2013
- 1,321
Indeed. It's a well known fact that most gang members always ask themselves "what would Jo Brand do?" before deciding on a course of action.
Ha! I doff my cap to you for that response...
Indeed. It's a well known fact that most gang members always ask themselves "what would Jo Brand do?" before deciding on a course of action.
Indeed. It's a well known fact that most gang members always ask themselves "what would Jo Brand do?" before deciding on a course of action.
Back on topic, bad acid attack in London on Friday. I don't recall one for a while. Wonder where they got the idea!
The fact that you think using rape as a weapon to attack a political opponent is simply ‘handbags’ is utterly deplorable and says everything I need to know about your character.
He did not threaten to rape her which is your claim in your first comment, and which I objected to because it was a false allegation.
But he thought about it.
The poster didn't say anything about someone thinking about raping someone. He claimed that he threatened to rape someone. There is a massive difference.
Back on topic, bad acid attack in London on Friday. I don't recall one for a while. Wonder where they got the idea!
So it's OK to do the former?
You are joking right? PLEASE tell me you're joking.
Close examination of many of my posts will reveal that what looks like a serious comment is actually intended to carry an undercurrent of irony, humour or sarcasm. Peek behind the words and you will often see that indeed I am joking but, because in a weird world there is a 1% chance I'm serious, it's easy to take the message at face value. Rest assured, I was joking.