Jlloyd Samuel

[BensGrandad]

A bit like Calde hasn't you mean?!

The difference being rthat Tanno did the job and was much more capable.

 

[NooBHA]

Surely giving him a free transfer would not cost us much money.

The player himself won't go on a Free Transfer. Why would he ? He has no incentive to do so unless we pay his contract up in full and if we are going to do that we might as well keep him at the club until it is up.

 

[GT49er]

The difference being rthat Tanno did the job and was much more capable.

Couldn't resist looking up Tanno's contribution ...................................

"After not playing at a professional level for six years he started at left back for an FA Cup clash against Woking. Taricco was sent off for a second bookable offence after 105 minutes. Taricco was sent off again, this time receiving a straight red card, during the 3–0 away defeat to Championship League leaders Southampton on 19th. November"

I think I prefer Calde's contribution - we'd have really been in the brown stuff without any credible LB if he'd got himself red-carded!

 

[Sheebo]

So, is there any truth in the Jlloyd rumour..?

 

[GT49er]

So, is there any truth in the Jlloyd rumour..?

Who knows? Best ask the thread starter..........................

 

[BensGrandad]

The player himself won't go on a Free Transfer. Why would he ? He has no incentive to do so unless we pay his contract up in full and if we are going to do that we might as well keep him at the club until it is up.

If CH has no intention of using him wouldnt it make sense to give him a free transfer and we make up his wages from what the new club offer to what he gets now. What is to be gained by keeping him here?

 

[NooBHA]

If CH has no intention of using him wouldnt it make sense to give him a free transfer and we make up his wages from what the new club offer to what he gets now. What is to be gained by keeping him here?

We are not a charity. Why pay someone for nothing. CH has never said he won't play him but it just seems that others are ahead of him but he can't ever come out and say he is never going to play him because you need to keep the lads morale up in case he really does need him.

 

[Postman Pat]

If CH has no intention of using him wouldnt it make sense to give him a free transfer and we make up his wages from what the new club offer to what he gets now. What is to be gained by keeping him here?

So we are paying that plus whatever wages we pay for his replacement, who probably won't play either ahead of Bong. It's a waste of money.

 

[BensGrandad]

CH has not come out and said he wont play him but the indications are that he is further down the pecking order than Calderon. If we let him go on a free transfer then subsidize his wages even if it be 50% or 60% for the remainder of his contract, it will be less than we are paying now and still getting the same game time.

 

[Stat Brother]

Wouldn't we be better off buying Lloyd Sam?

 

[Sheebo]

Who knows? Best ask the thread starter..........................

There was no rumour. It's just a mutual suggestion based on extensive football knowledge, suggested by BG & myself...

 

[Postman Pat]

CH has not come out and said he wont play him but the indications are that he is further down the pecking order than Calderon. If we let him go on a free transfer then subsidize his wages even if it be 50% or 60% for the remainder of his contract, it will be less than we are paying now and still getting the same game time.

But also sign another left-back to not play?! So we could be 200% worse off.

 

[Bolton va va]

He's also very, very shit.

If he's very, very shit, he must have improved a fair bit since he left Bolton.

 

[Lady Whistledown]

Wouldn't we be better off buying Lloyd Sam?

We'd be better off buying Samuel L Jackson.

 

[LlcoolJ]

We'd be better off buying Samuel L Jackson.

Can he play left back? Only issue might be wages though.

 

[Lethargic]

CH has not come out and said he wont play him but the indications are that he is further down the pecking order than Calderon. If we let him go on a free transfer then subsidize his wages even if it be 50% or 60% for the remainder of his contract, it will be less than we are paying now and still getting the same game time.

If we weren't playing a new centre back pairing at the same time (or constantly change CBs) he might have put Chicksen in but CH might have felt he needed Calderons experience to balance. Basically it's all ifs, buts and maybes and we don't know, same as we have no idea of contract details so in conclusion Who knows?

 

[Sheebo]

Think he may be out of contract at Paykan - could it be worth us renewing our interest...?

 

[LamieRobertson]

Think he may be out of contract at Paykan - could it be worth us renewing our interest...?

Oh dear

 

[Sheebo]

Oh dear

What's up?

 

[LamieRobertson]

What's up?

Well...did you see what someone said about the poster who resurrected the 'left back' thread