ClemFandango
Active member
- Oct 2, 2023
- 165
That's a good point. I had only half an eye on the kerfuffle after the Edwards conviction because the usual suspects were using it as as a stick to beat the BBC with (boring), but assumed they had done something wrong to justify the late demanding of repayment of salary.
Having now checked the facts it seems there was no wrongdoing by the BBC and the criticism was indeed just more campaigning by the 'defund the BBC
You can admire an institution without being wilfully blind to its failings too. They screwed up in spades over Edwards. There were lots of complaints from BBC underlings (see the Newsnight investigation) before finally the parents of a teenager went to the papers because the corporation ignored their concerns. And that was before the cops charged him with having nonce pictures. Now, somewhat belatedly, the new chairman wants him to repay £200K of his £450K salary. Does that really suggest everything was ‘processed appropriately’?I'm saying Jenas wasn't a PR car crash (so it is not 'another'), and it looks like Edwards was also processed appropriately.
My regard for the BBC is undiminished.
It is a car crash for the individuals, of course.