I note you didn't take up my challenge earlier so, in what way does Corbyn advocate mass importation of cheap labour when he's against the free movement across the EU ?
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Jeremy Corbyn.
- Thread starter Diablo
- Start date
I note you didn't take up my challenge earlier so, in what way does Corbyn advocate mass importation of cheap labour when he's against the free movement across the EU ?
looney
Banned
- Jul 7, 2003
- 15,652
I read he was supporting open borders policy
scoobiewhite
Well-known member
Putting aside the political arguments in this thread, would you care to explain what 'traits' of learning difficulties or aspergers are being displayed?
If you can give a reasoned knowledgable response fair enough. I'll check back and let you know what I think of your post if you can't...
Well yes. If he can't handle a leadership battle against some lightweight contenders, he doesn't exactly project determination and fortitude. And as for him uniting the party, setting up the Labour Group for Common Good and, as has been pointed out, attracting the criticism of the likes of Prescott, seems to be aimed at splitting the party - not exactly the actions of a potential leader. I can see him leaving the party and standing as a Tory leader at some point in the future though
Get him into UKIP, at least when i mistakenly put his photo up on a UKIP thread, i could claim seeing in the future.......actually the UKIP candidates for the London Assembly election. Many impressive performances were given by the candidates in the public speaking section. There were young candidates, older ones, plenty of female candidates, LGBT candidates, ethnic minority candidates and speeches were delivered in the patrician tones of the exclusive parts of town as well as 'gor blimey' cockney.....could do a job.
pastafarian
Well-known member
are you sure about this? i always thought he supports free movement of people across EU,has something changed?
this article he wrote for the independent says he supports it,ill admit its late so ive only done a very quick google search so perhaps his views have changed
http://www.independent.co.uk/voices...-should-really-be-talking-about-10310078.html
AlbionPics&SouthCoastTwit
New member
After seeing the abhorid prices for large schwanzen in Germany he now favours free bowel movement in Europe. I wonder what Angela thinks of that.
I think you've read incorrectly. To my knowledge he has said he prefers to stay in the EU but on changed terms. He hasn't said anything more than this to my knowledge.
I regret that post and have PMed the person in question. I admit I was wrong and have apologised.
looney
Banned
- Jul 7, 2003
- 15,652
No. An internationalist would want all borders dropped not a few select ones that would risk impoverishing the poorest members of an area. Which is why an Ethical socialist would object also n the grounds of supporting the poorest ad most vulnerable in a community.
Lord Bracknells view is Stalinist.
Over ride the wishes of the people once by flooding the country with Foreigners(for what ever reason), then when it begins to get out of controll overide the people again by abolishing planning laws to reiforce the agenda they didn't want in the first place. No doubt any effective opposition to this would be met with advocacy of reeducation camps or gulags.
A democratic socialist would aquire a mandate first and try to win arquements rather than browbeating people, so would a liberal socialist.
I am not sure what you are, I'll stick with a f"""ing tory.
pb21
Well-known member
- Apr 23, 2010
- 6,731
Why not just Tory?
I'm up for all borders. But Europe is a start, and a more realistic goal.
looney
Banned
- Jul 7, 2003
- 15,652
A realistic goal for what? seeing a continent brought to its knees by waves of imigration with a healthy mix of holy warriors. Do expect Europes poor to say well our greater impoverishment will be worth it as the internationalists are promoting free movement.
Your realistic goal is to make poor people poorer to sate your ego and provide lots of cheap labour for greedy Labour intensive businesses, tory.
BTW Internationalism is about worldwide worker cooperation to overthrow capital, it has nothing to do with dropping borders. Its like disarming one side in a gunfight and claiming its a move towards gun controll.
You dont understand socialism and your callous approach to Europes vulnerable stinks of capitalism. QED you are a friggin tory.
Internationalism is about facilitating political and economic cooperation. So, "borders" can be on the agenda. In fact anything which fascilitates these aims can be considered.
All borders ie the question you raised and asked me about.
looney
Banned
- Jul 7, 2003
- 15,652
Meanigless waffle, or as the yanks say "verb free politics". If you do not wish to be concidered someone who is clueless and just spouting consequence free utopianism you need to explain how this would work
Internationalism is expressed to be for the common good, how is screwing over the poor good? Even the idiot Yvette Cooper is today expressing it in terms of a burden "that should be shared among all councils". But i suppose its good for you and your tory chums.
pastafarian
Well-known member
Are you trying to say this is final evidence that Newspapers hash up dodgy alarmist headlines to suck people in to buying their print?
Well bugger me with a fish fork .........what a surprise,this never occurred to me.
glad your eye is on the ball mustafa,what would us simpletons that only read headlines do without you.
Horton's halftime iceberg
Blooming Marvellous
This is brilliant, where did you find it. It would be full on hilarious if it wasn't so close to the mark.
beorhthelm
A. Virgo, Football Genius
- Jul 21, 2003
- 36,065
presumably somewhere left wing bias, as it focuses on the right wing press. it is on the money, all papers and news outlets do this, with all politicians, or whoever else is the source. some are better than others, but not along political lines.