[Albion] Jay Rodriquez - would you boo him?

[el punal]

He's a nasty, rude little man - and deserves a world of booing if ever he appears at the Amex.

Well the chances of that happening (I hope) are pretty remote. Barring a disaster/miracle we’re staying up, they’re going down.

 

[Mellotron]

Really? Not in my book. The bloke is a tosser.

He's a prat, sure, but we don't know what he actually said. Also I'm sure Bong wants the whole thing behind him too, and part of our annoyance is with Burnley fans dredging it back up again.

 

[rippleman]

Given the context of the complicated situation, and that he was not found guilty of anything, no.

He does, however, come across as a complete bellend.

Noooo...you have been listening to the Burnley fans! Rodriguez was NOT found "NOT GUILTY". Read the other thread.

 

[Thunder Bolt]

Yep would definitely booo. Baffled and amazed so many are saying no.

It wasn't proved that he said anything wrong, but there again it wasn't proved he did either.

We would be setting ourselves up as judge and jury, which is exactly what we're accusing the Burnley fans of.

 

[Thunder Bolt]

Mmmm did you heckle Pritchard when he played for Norwich in the thrashing? Quite sure 99% of the home fans did that afternoon.

No. I also query your 99% of the the home fans. The East stand wouldn't dream of doing such a thing.

 

[Marshy]

I'm certain I would not boo him. Bong has moved on so should we.

 

[wellquickwoody]

I think laughing at him might be might be more effective.

 

[seagulls4ever]

Noooo...you have been listening to the Burnley fans! Rodriguez was NOT found "NOT GUILTY". Read the other thread.

I didn't say he was found 'not guilty'. I said he was not found guilty of anything, as in the case was not proven, so he wasn't found guilty of anything - not that the judgement was 'not guilty'. They are two different statements.

 

[Gazwag]

You know what you are
You know what you arrrre
It maybe not proven
But you know what you are

 

[Arthritic Toe]

It would be so much classier to not boo him. Unfortunately though, crowd mentality will prevail and he will get booed.

 

[El Presidente]

Really? Not in my book. The bloke is a tosser.

That still makes him better than a woman though in your book.

 

[hart's shirt]

The point's been made, so it's probably time to draw a line under all of it now before it becomes somewhat unedifying.

 

[Insel affe]

No, contrary to popular belief I am not a child.

 

[Papa Lazarou]

Why bother with a championship player. But if you want to just make sure you place your hand in front of your mouth first

Well the chances of that happening (I hope) are pretty remote. Barring a disaster/miracle we’re staying up, they’re going down.

I'm sure he'll get a transfer to a lower end Premier League team in the summer, so it's then 'game on'

 

[oneillco]

Personally, I'd like to see the entire crowd point and laugh at him every time he touched the ball.

This... that would be fantastic.

 

[mejonaNO12 aka riskit]

No.

1 - He wasn't found guilty of anything. It was not proven. Whatever you think, it wasn't proven.
2 - It would just drag it up again, be reported, and potentially prompt Bong being bood by idiots.
3 - Booing is just a bit twatty anyway, isn't it.
4 - He wasn't found guilty of anything
5 - He will definitely score
6 - He wasn't found guilty of anything

 

[Munkfish]

No but I probably would join in with, Jay Rodriguez is a wanker... is a wanker though.

 

[Wardy's twin]

Can we please stop this sorry debate it is doing neither club any favours. We have our opinion , they have theirs.

 

[GT49er]

Maybe a token boo when the teams are announced, then forget it.



Although the pointing and laughing sounds good!

 

[Napper]

wouldn’t boo as don’t know all the facts . The panel did and nothing proven so wouldn’t be judge and jury .

Whole thing best to not mention and get involved