Jarret Good/Bad

[b.w.2.]

Was very impressed with Jarrett... pace and the ability to get past people... yes, he could improve his defending, but that isn't his primary role... should have finished the excellent cross from Currie as well... but, overall, a

 

[Citrus]

I thought he was brilliant and was very surprised when he went off and not Currie.

 

[Soton Seagull]

definate potential, only young so should mayure in to the role. reading looked scared when he ran at them.

 

[Don Tmatter]

So is he going to have about 8 children scattered around Kent?

and rifle through his team-mates pockets in the changing rooms when they're not there

 

[Finchley Seagull]

Looked good with the ball but tended to run into no man's land rather than pass e.g when Hinshelwood overlapped in second half he cut inside and lost the ball.

However, he is only young and will learn. Probably not far off Brooker's standard with time to learn.

 

[S'hampton Seagull]

Looked good with the ball but tended to run into no man's land rather than pass e.g when Hinshelwood overlapped in second half he cut inside and lost the ball.

However, he is only young and will learn. Probably not far off Brooker's standard with time to learn.

I agree, after some the boring (but effective) displays we witnessed last season, isn't it refersing to have a few players capable of a bit of flair?

 

[Finchley Seagull]

Yes it will be good to watch him develope. That is presumably why we gave him a three year contract as McGhee knew he would not be the finished article immediately.

 

[Meade's Ball]

Him and Molango were isolated in their separate positions. At home, with more support, we'll see him do wonders, i believe.

 

[elbowpatches]

Molango and Jarrett will be quality players which will hopefully stay with us to Falmer and up to the premiership. How's that for an optomistic prediction?