The real test then is how we respond to the low block. West Ham came at us and got eviscerated. Many others haven't and left with points. How does Zerbing effectively and consistently deal with a deep defence?
Yes, they talked about that at length. I haven’t watched the links above but it was certainly shown pre Brentford game last night.And it all starts with fannying about at the back…he hasn’t worked that out yet has he?
I agree, the chances created are better. those stats refeered to 'big chances' and I think this is where Potterball struggled a little (It is necessary to insert here that I fully understand how important Potter was for us and that he was steering us in the right direction).
I am starting to wonder if what is in place for De Zerbi may be enough to keep him here.
Obviously a lot better compared to than December last year but I don't know if there's much difference from Caicedo-era Potter.
in games like West Ham and Liverpool, this must be what it's like to support Man CityHighest possession. 2nd highest passes of sequence 10+. It's incredible really. Utterly incredible. That isn't even over just a few games. It's most of the season. Nuts.
In both recent cases ... we really should have done enough to win, our finishing fell short. Against palace we should've been 2-0 up and cruising but got f***ed by an incompetent VAR and Mac Allister should've scored 3. Against fulham we had chance after chance after chance. Very easy to say the low block is what stopped us but equally it was awful finishing and dodgy refereeing.The real test then is how we respond to the low block. West Ham came at us and got eviscerated. Many others haven't and left with points. How does Zerbing effectively and consistently deal with a deep defence?
Wonder when the illustrious former Liverpool Captain Souness will apologies?
To my eye the pace of play is the big difference, although I'm struggling to find a metric to back this up.Obviously a lot better compared to than December last year but I don't know if there's much difference from Caicedo-era Potter.
Although the stats are a little skewed by a long period of pre-Caicedo and Mitoma in lSt seasons stats, and excluding Potters games this season. Ultimately its better players that are a large driving force of this, and Caicedo, Mitoma and Ferguson coming through has made a major difference. De Zerbi is of course managing them wonderfully.
If City is the benchmark of our playing style, then they give clues to how to do this. 1. Have players who can dribble past defenders. Adding Mitoma, and March getting better has added this dimension. 2. Be able to win soft penalties. Not quite there yet, we've had a few denied of late. 3. Have a superb free kick taker to score from set pieces when we can't get past the block. Don't have this yet.The real test then is how we respond to the low block. West Ham came at us and got eviscerated. Many others haven't and left with points. How does Zerbing effectively and consistently deal with a deep defence?
This. It really pisses me off that EVERY time the odd game comes along where we don't finish well and/or get decent luck then our manager has either been "worked out" by his opposite number or our system of play just is no good...In both recent cases ... we really should have done enough to win, our finishing fell short. Against palace we should've been 2-0 up and cruising but got f***ed by an incompetent VAR and Mac Allister should've scored 3. Against fulham we had chance after chance after chance. Very easy to say the low block is what stopped us but equally it was awful finishing and dodgy refereeing.
That is precisely what I was thinking at half-time on Saturday. Up till then it had been a relatively dull game - where we had just been so superior to West Ham, without creating a huge amount of chances. I was struggling to get hugely involved - because we were just so much better than them, it wasn't much of a game. I was thinking that 'this is what it must be like for the big clubs - routine wins over the 'minnows' - with just the occasional blip - and then getting up for the big clashes with the top 6-7'.in games like West Ham and Liverpool, this must be what it's like to support Man City
Scoff . They're a poor man's RDZ-ball.in games like West Ham and Liverpool, this must be what it's like to support Man City
I really liked the first half, it flew by and I get bored at football easily.That is precisely what I was thinking at half-time on Saturday. Up till then it had been a relatively dull game - where we had just been so superior to West Ham, without creating a huge amount of chances. I was struggling to get hugely involved - because we were just so much better than them, it wasn't much of a game. I was thinking that 'this is what it must be like for the big clubs - routine wins over the 'minnows' - with just the occasional blip - and then getting up for the big clashes with the top 6-7'.
Picked up with the piss-taking in the second half - which ramped up the play and the atmosphere.
Yes, that might be the case - but also the case might be that some of the players have had a dip in form. From Christmas to mid-February the whole team was absolutely on fire. It doesn’t matter how good you are that level of excellence can’t be sustained for ever. It just so happened that the performance and result against West Ham was perfect, for whatever reason. Everybody, and everything, clicked. Confidence was sky high with the icing on the cake of giving our young starlets Buonanotte and Enciso a run out was a management master stroke.The real test then is how we respond to the low block. West Ham came at us and got eviscerated. Many others haven't and left with points. How does Zerbing effectively and consistently deal with a deep defence?
I thought West Ham sat in pretty deep and were one of the most passive sides I’ve seen in a long whileThe real test then is how we respond to the low block. West Ham came at us and got eviscerated. Many others haven't and left with points. How does Zerbing effectively and consistently deal with a deep defence?