junior
Well-known member
Are you on crack?
Provided he wasnt the only striker that we signed and was seen as a squad member to add depth to the squad rather than a first choice why not?
James Wilson is considering a loan deal in January, he did OK for us before he got ill, hopefully now fully recovered, is he worth considering as we now have space for another loan. I think he's worth a go as alternative to Baldock, be good to get in a striker of our own as well.
Sorry I mistook his age and thought that he was 20 at the moment but on checking he is 21 and is 22 in December so the answer would be no as he would take a squad place in the 25 named so we would have no vacancy to accomodate him
He'll struggle to ever make it as a reliable striker even in the Championship.
Redcafe threads about Wilson gave up on him ages ago. At one point, he was the golden boy of their youth system.
If the the alternative is nothing sign him up, otherwise no thanks.
For one thing, because you can't simply 'add depth to the squad'. He's not U21, so would need to be named in the 25 man squad, along with the other striker(s) you're expecting. Who are you leaving out to make room for Wilson's non-contribution?
It's strange how only you mentioned JW wasn't available as an under 21.
Do you have a little sideline as an 'alibi provider'?
An NSC consensus.
Are you on crack?