Weststander
Well-known member
Since when was it an offence to wind up someone who's child had died?
Stone me for suggesting it (obviously).
Must be a zzzzz wind up from someone lacking intelligence.
Since when was it an offence to wind up someone who's child had died?
Stone me for suggesting it (obviously).
Whether it is illegal or just bereft of any morality, It should still be West Ham's choice to ban him for life. Not sure it needs to go to any court for them to do that.
Danny Mills on R5L on this currently. He lost a child himself so has more empathy than most. Said he wouldn't have blamed Livermore from going in the crowd and punching the idiot.
This has made me a bit emotional. I can't find words to describe the perpetrator. Hopefully he will be outed, banned and ostracised
Since when was it an offence to wind up someone who's child had died?
Stone me for suggesting it (obviously).
I despair. Why do you think there has to be a specific offence for every single despicable action, someone could possibly undertake? You must be a truly bitter individual if you need an answer.
Imagine being someone who hears about someone being taunted for the fact their baby had died and going "meh, not illegal".
Wow.
It's the lowest of the low, you would agree with that wouldn't you? It's a deeply unpleasant thing to say to another human being, whatever the context.
Exactly this. You’d think there would be one thing we can all agree wouldn’t be acceptable and then someone comes out with that.
Seemingly it’s fine if it’s just ‘bantz’
A club has the right to ban people from its premises, in just the same way a pub or restaurant can. Basically, West Ham are saying, we want nothing to do with morons like you. Keep away.
I'm sure you have the intelligence to realise this.
Causing Intentional harassment, alarm or distress is an offence under the Public Order Act.
Mothy i think you should be stoned[ maybe not with real stones or else my point is losted] for such an offences post.How can you post this where is your humanity?
It's not really where i would want to go personally & think it's immoral & disgusting. I was questioning why a life ban was expected - as i didnt think legally he's done anything wrong (i wasn't there & dont know what what was said). But as others have pointed out - each club has the right of refusal to entry of whoever they so wish & so it is their (the clubs) choice. & they will likely be influenced by trial by social media etc. By the perrenially morally outraged - which is a sad state the country / world is getting itself into. Maybe justifiably in this case - but there are so many more where an individual error of judgement is costing jobs & lives - thanks to keyboard warriors righting the wrongs of events that they werent even party to
Let's not pretend that we don't have degenerates of that sort "supporting" our club as well.
It's not really where i would want to go personally & think it's immoral & disgusting. I was questioning why a life ban was expected - as i didnt think legally he's done anything wrong (i wasn't there & dont know what what was said). But as others have pointed out - each club has the right of refusal to entry of whoever they so wish & so it is their (the clubs) choice. & they will likely be influenced by trial by social media etc. By the perrenially morally outraged - which is a sad state the country / world is getting itself into. Maybe justifiably in this case - but there are so many more where an individual error of judgement is costing jobs & lives - thanks to keyboard warriors righting the wrongs of events that they werent even party to
West Brom expect no action to be taken against Livermore. If true, will this excuse other players if they take exception to someone shouting abuse at them or is it just exceptional circumstances?
What if Livermore did actually miss-hear the West Ham fan (as has been claimed)? He's understandably quite touchy about it so it is possible. Obviously calling him a Yid is unacceptable but less so that taunting him about his dead son, I would think.
I'd expect West Brom to support their man, and take no action. The FA however, MUST surely apply some punishment. They can't turn a blind eye to a player wading into the crowd to attack a fan, however bad the verbal provocation. No chance they can be seen to set that precedent.
West Brom expect no action to be taken against Livermore. If true, will this excuse other players if they take exception to someone shouting abuse at them or is it just exceptional circumstances?
What if Livermore did actually miss-hear the West Ham fan (as has been claimed)? He's understandably quite touchy about it so it is possible. Obviously calling him a Yid is unacceptable but less so that taunting him about his dead son, I would think.
It's not really where i would want to go personally & think it's immoral & disgusting. I was questioning why a life ban was expected - as i didnt think legally he's done anything wrong (i wasn't there & dont know what what was said). But as others have pointed out - each club has the right of refusal to entry of whoever they so wish & so it is their (the clubs) choice. & they will likely be influenced by trial by social media etc. By the perrenially morally outraged - which is a sad state the country / world is getting itself into. Maybe justifiably in this case - but there are so many more where an individual error of judgement is costing jobs & lives - thanks to keyboard warriors righting the wrongs of events that they werent even party to
Keep digging