murraymints4brighton
Well-known member
Not another Goody thread
You mean apart from the years when I worked at Laughton Lodge?
Irrelevant anyway as it was simple highlight of the ridiculous double standards on here. Someone complains about mock outrage and then appears to show that exact same mock outrage.
Did anyone really believe Clifford when he said "...the family now want privacy"? This is a real cash cow for the surviving family and various others.
This morning's breaking news is that equipment is now in place for moving the coffin.
Absolutely. Those of us who despise the entire Goody circus and what it represents will continue to attack it. You can sit there with your OK! magazine and Sun 20 page funeral supplement, and think that caring about a skilfully-manipulated media creation makes you a better person than those of us who are sneering. No doubt you'll be dabbing your eyes and shouting out "WHY? WHY?" in between banning people who don't share your views.
A stricken husband takes a moment out to reflect on the seriousness of the occasion.
Surely you can't be the same Uncle Spielberg who claimed it was "shameful" that someone complained to the BBC about Ian Hart? Because that would make it OK to mock people with learning difficulties and yet not OK to make sick jokes about a talentless, bullying racist married to a convicted thug, wouldn't it?
Not seen that before (thankfully). Please tell me this is a joke like fork handles.
NO. Get your shit togeteher I think you are referring to the incident when Harty phoned into his show pissed and some muppet posted a link to complain. So GET YOUR FACTS RIGHT before you make a false claim.
So it really wasn't applicable or necessary to post what you said about Harty then, and especially if you are talking about someone of like charitable interests apprently, to yourself? (unless you were getting paid and thereby a recipient from charitable donations?)