Would prefer O'Connell to Moore personally
Naughty as in asking for a lot of money to release their asset?
They can do literally whatever they want.
What have they done?
Blimey that is naughty. Don't they know who we are?Asked far too much...
Of course... still, I, and I believe I'm in the majority, think they are taking the p1ss...
Or they simply don't want to sell him. What's wrong with that?Of course... still, I, and I believe I'm in the majority, think they are taking the p1ss...
Very true, we can all moan and say how unfair it is, but he is contracted to Reading, so they can put any price they like on his head.
Blimey that is naughty. Don't they know who we are?
Blimey that is naughty. Don't they know who we are?
They can 'take the piss' all they like.
They will release their asset when they feel they have received an offer which is too good to refuse.
It's literally the very basis of business.
I find your view truly odd. We did the very same with Stephens 2 seasons ago. We valued keeping him far above what Burnley offered.
True. They set the price, we can buy if we like.Naughty as in asking for a lot of money to release their asset?
They can do literally whatever they want.
Or they simply don't want to sell him. What's wrong with that?
"Hi Triggaaar, I would like to buy your apple for £20p"
"Thanks Mejona, but I actually am quite hungry and I want to eat it."
"Yeah, but I'm also hungry and I want your apple"
"Oh Ok then. Here you go."
Or...
"Hi Triggaaar, I would like to buy your apple for £10M"
"Thanks Mejona, but I actually am quite hungry and I want to eat it."
"Yeah, but I'm also hungry and I want your apple"
"£15M and you can have my apple."
"You must really like that apple".
Yes, I'm starving, and it's my apple of choice...
Grtanny Smith? russet?