Corrected for you.
Hence me saying the disinterested ones. Obviously we've had better loanees!
Corrected for you.
This, how you can judge him on the 8 or so minutes he seems to get is ridiculous.Would like to see him have a run in the team before judging from a few sub appearances. Was unlucky with the injury. Hasn’t done much but also seems a neat and tidy player to me
I don't like to criticise players but I'm struggling to recall when we last made a really effective loan signing.
Good point! Maybe I should also ask what have the Romans ever done for us?!Err, Murray?..
This is a joke thread, right? He offered more in the 10 minutes he was on than some had for the previous 80, probably should have had 20-25 minutes on that performance.
You’re too slow and you don’t care.
agreed ...no urgency at all and doesn't seem to give a hoot........either get stuck in or eff off back to the bridgeI agree, every time i see him he never seems to actually chase the ball down, multiple times since he came on, if he had gone for the ball he would have got there and we could have had a good chance. He seems skillful but looks to put in minimal effort.
I agree, every time i see him he never seems to actually chase the ball down, multiple times since he came on, if he had gone for the ball he would have got there and we could have had a good chance. He seems skillful but looks to put in minimal effort.
You’re too slow and you don’t care.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Worth questioning his deployment, but not worth a thread, especially with that 'tone'.
I don't recall Lingard pulling up too many trees during his time here. Now look at him.
At Huddersfield Izzy threw strops when subbed off. Different story here. I am sure CH will deploy him appropriately, and with effect.
Whoever suggested he should 'get stuck in' sounds like one of those blokes on the touchline at a kids game, screaming at a six year old to 'get rid of it'.