brightonlass2009
Sports sports sports!
It's worse than when they cut off the final few laps of the F1 during the San Marino Grand Prix in 2005. That was shameful, but this is just a f***ing joke.
Would not of happened on Sky .
went to a break and missed the f***ing goal? thats our strike force isnt it?Went to a break and missed the f***ing goal, what a joke!
It's worse than when they cut off the final few laps of the F1 during the San Marino Grand Prix in 2005. That was shameful, but this is just a f***ing joke.
went to a break and missed the f***ing goal? thats our strike force isnt it?
Did anyone else notice that they changed the format of the picture after the final whistle. I watched 120 minutes of football on 4:3 ratio, for them to suddenly turn it to widescreen AFTER the ruddy game had finished
They probably bought the coverage off another provider who, for some surreal reason, only had a 4:3 setup for the SD downmix. Why on earth anyone would do that I dunno; but it likely wasn't ITV filming the game to begin with.
ITV executive chairman Michael Grade called it 'an unprecedented technical error'. Error, that is. Not fault. You can safely assume someone got a coating for this because, while it was human error, it was definitely their fault.
If the gallery in the OB truck at Goodison Park had open talkback to Technicolour Network Services, to whom ITV outsource their transmission operation, it would have been filled with industrial language. The cause we now know was the premature triggering of an automated system for cueing commercial breaks. With the game deep into extra time, a recalculation of the programme's original running order must already have been made. If only the breaks had been switched from automatic to manual.
Working in a transmission room is TV without glamour. The inhabitants are tasked with keeping a schedule running seamlessly. Do a good job and no one notices. Mess up and you could take a programme off air. Or miss a crucial goal.
With communication with the ITV regions also needed and - with the news looming - ITN in Holborn, it is also a workplace which requires a steady nerve. The ensuing problems smacked of increasing chaos, capped by a sight of the usually hidden on-air clock ahead of the News at 10. A bad night for Liverpool.
An even worse one for ITV.
Living near the Leeds transmitter, I was lucky enough to see the goal I sat through two hours of toss for - just. Shit game, compounded by ITV's proof (once more) that they are not competent enough to be broadcasting domestic competitive football
.. and so it goes on
What the f*** is wrong with people in this country. Was it the death of Diana that kicked it all off ?
On what grounds exactly do you disagree?
ITV is the brand that the product, the programme, goes out on. If any company they hire to provide the service screw up, it is ITV's fault. That is how business works.
They screwed up. Again. They have been showing live domestic competitive football for a total of, what, 12 months combined? And they completely messed it up. Now look at Sky and BBC's record.
The facts speak for themselves. ITV f***ed up big time and will pay for it - they will be working really, really hard every day now to restore backers confidence.
OK - honest question, if the same had happened on the BBC or SKY would you feel the same ?
I'd also like to you (in your own understanding of how these things work) explain why this was unlikely to happen on the other networks, which you appear to be implying.
First question - yes, absolutely. To watch nearly an entire game and for that to happen, followed by two mumbled apologies from the host.. pretty dire, to be honest with you. The same would apply if I were watching a crime thriller, or my favourite comedy, or an action movie - on any channel.
I am not implying these things don't happen on other networks. They do. Only a few months ago, my girlfriend was watching "The Paul O'Grady Show" on Channel 4 because a singer she likes was on, and it cut out mid-interview and showed a basic "BT error" screen.
What I am saying is this particular incident is, and would be, an embarrassment if it were the BBC who hired that third party company, or Sky, or Setanta! Unfortunately, it was ITV, and because of their lack of experience, and general poor production values since they began broadcasting live domestic football (widely acknowledged by the media, and many viewers alike), it is even more disappointing.
The handling of the garbled apology for "anybody out there who may have missed the deciding goal" did somewhat sum up things - a bit half-arsed.
I think we've been spoilt by the BBC coverage to be honest, although in ITVs defence (much quoted above...) they are working under very very different pressures.
I'll reiterate that last nights f*** up wasn't the fault of ITV, but I think we can all agree that the BBC are much much better at doing the FA Cup.
The FA Cup is a national institution and it's only correct that another national institution should be given the exclusive rights to cover it.
What word would Hansen use to being mistaken for Ratcliffe? Woeful? Shocking?
Editorial decision which they can be completely blamed for.
.. but as for last night, the majority of people are barking up the wrong tree.