Dr. Notthenineo'clocknews
Remainer
who refers to people as 'coloured' these days?
without trawling through 5 pages, exactly this, I checked the opening post in case it was dated 1979
who refers to people as 'coloured' these days?
I've just read an article where ITV producers have been reprimanded for using the term coloured to describe football players and coaches. The news item concerned racism in football and how it has changed but stated even now there are only three coloured managers in the game. Excuse me for being thick but what is the acceptable description of someone who isn't white.
So is Steven Pienaar black or coloured ?
Gareth Keenan can explain the correct terms to use:
[yt]AcB0YAyFlyg[/yt]
Sigh!! It's a bit of non-issue really , anyone getting the hump about being called coloured just needs to man up a bit, there are far more important issues to deal with, i watched a programme called " i love 1979" the other day, there was a black woman on there getting tetchy because white women were copying the famous bo derek cornrow haircut back then, and she was moaning because " er hello, we've ( black people) been doing it for ages, christ almighty, is there anything some of these people wont take offence at ?3 pages into a thread about race issues and bushy is yet to get involved....surely some sort of record?
Jeez there are some techty people on here..(Sorry not allowed to name another poster). Some of you are'nt old enough to remember but back in the 50s when immigrants were called 'Black' there was an outcry because of it being considered abusive and racist...so they changed it by saying that they had to call them 'Coloured'....now that word is considered racist and we are being told they are 'Black'....I don't really care....what's in a name anyway...to me a person is a person,I look past the skin colour and see the personality inside...I once worked with a load of ...er what shall I say...people who were'nt my colour...in fact only 3 of us were white...We got called 'Honky'...we'd just laugh and call them' Blacks' and they laugh...all very light banter and we all got along fine.
What is really racist in my opinion is the touchiness of politicians and Civil Service personal who trying to intergate with their voters by coming out with 'You must not say,BLACKboard or BLACKmail"
Some people need to get a life..
Sigh!! It's a bit of non-issue really , anyone getting the hump about being called coloured just needs to man up a bit, there are far more important issues to deal with, i watched a programme called " i love 1979" the other day, there was a black woman on there getting tetchy because white women were copying the famous bo derek cornrow haircut back then, and she was moaning because " er hello, we've ( black people) been doing it for ages, christ almighty, is there anything some of these people wont take offence at ?
Sigh!! It's a bit of non-issue really , anyone getting the hump about being called coloured just needs to man up a bit, there are far more important issues to deal with, i watched a programme called " i love 1979" the other day, there was a black woman on there getting tetchy because white women were copying the famous bo derek cornrow haircut back then, and she was moaning because " er hello, we've ( black people) been doing it for ages, christ almighty, is there anything some of these people wont take offence at ?
Who the f*** are you calling a chav? chav is a term of abuse , no two ways about it, coloured, isnt, thats why the white working classes get upset , because "your type of people" i.e guardian reading civil servant types, feel perfectly free to sneer at, and look down upon them, in a way they never dream of with blacks or asians.Bushy, at last, what would a race discussion be on NSC without your insightful input.
If it's a non-issue, why not just accept not using the term? If there are plenty of more important things to worry about, how difficult can it be for someone to simply change their use of their language?
I actually heard on the radio complaints from 'your' type of people the other day, apparently the 'Chavs' are now becoming offended at being called 'Chavs'. Oh yes, the white jogging suit bottom wearing burberry cap brigade are upset at the label. You lot need to man up!
From the inside of my shoe I have an answer for you. You are entitled to your opinion as I am mine and I agree that this is a debate,so I put forward my feelings on this subject showing that you cannot please everybody,sometimes it's alright to call them coloured,some find that an insult,sometimes it's alright to call them black,some find it an insult...it does'nt matter what term you use someone will find it offensive,me,I don't care what term you use...what I was illustrating with that 'Honky remark is that if you don't find words offenesive people of all colours and denominations can get along perfectly well.Tetchy? It's just a debate isn't it? You're referring to banter you had with people you know. I call one of my friends a 'big nose twat', however if I meet someone else with a big nose, I don't call them a 'big nose twat'. Is it really that difficult over 60 years to accept certain attitudes in society change? Does it really take a massive intellect to adapt and develop to what others find offensive?
Clearly you are white, as am I in a predominantly and historically white country. How can you or I possibly pretend to understand what discrimination is? It certainly isn't comparable to being called 'honky' by your black co-workers or friends.
I don't pretend to know how someone from another ethnic background feels about things, but I know through key moments in history, whether apartheid, the civil rights movement in America, that the word 'coloured' is offensive to many people of black ethnic origin. If you don't understand this, then I honestly think you must live in a shoe.
Who the f*** are you calling a chav? chav is a term of abuse , no two ways about it, coloured, isnt, thats why the white working classes get upset , because "your type of people" i.e guardian reading civil servant types, feel perfectly free to sneer at, and look down upon them, in a way they never dream of with blacks or asians.
You mean you've never had a point so well debunked.Brilliant. I can't add anything to that. I've never had a point so well enforced.
From the inside of my shoe I have an answer for you. You are entitled to your opinion as I am mine and I agree that this is a debate,so I put forward my feelings on this subject showing that you cannot please everybody,sometimes it's alright to call them coloured,some find that an insult,sometimes it's alright to call them black,some find it an insult...it does'nt matter what term you use someone will find it offensive,me,I don't care what term you use...what I was illustrating with that 'Honky remark is that if you don't find words offenesive people of all colours and denominations can get along perfectly well.
You are telling me I don't understand history...(I was a War historian) some things I don't understand but having lived through these times I did get an insight to all the Civil Rights and the 50s immigration,in fact I watched the 'Empire Windrush' bring in the first people from the West Indies,I saw notices in London B&Bs No Blacks or Dogs' later it was ' No Coloureds '
For the record I have a big nose...never forgive Monty Python for the 'Life of Brian'...
But just as a matter of interest...what do you call these black/coloured/ people?
Must go now,just noticed a bootlace hanging from the roof!
You mean you've never had a point so well debunked.
All you're doing is making flimsy insinuations that you've "made your point" or that my posts have done it for you , without really saying anything concrete , because you cant, I look forward to your next pontless , airy fairy remark that hints at a lot but says little.it's not often I genuinely laugh when I read NSC, but there are always exceptions!