Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

It was a goal, wasn't it?









nwgull

Well-known member
Jul 25, 2003
14,533
Manchester
The ref couldn't believe that TK made such a hash of it without being fouled - he wasn't even touched.

Dunk and the defender were having a bit of argy-bargy, but that was standard 50-50 stuff and could have been a penalty if it was a foul on anyone.
 


sdmartin1

Well-known member
Sep 23, 2008
1,258
Tommy K cocked it up pure and simple and the ref gave him a get out of jail card. That said the ref was absolutely clueless, so was unsurprising.
 


















British Bulldog

The great escape
Feb 6, 2006
10,974
Even in slow motion saw nothing wrong with it, but then again I'm bias as well.
 




Dec 29, 2011
8,204
Looked a good goal to me but then I am Bias

I'm not bias and it still looked a goal to me. That being said, I remember numerous occasions throughout the years where out GK has fumbled the ball but we got a FK for it, so swings and roundabouts, although I don't think I'd be so gracious if it had ended 1-1.
 


el punal

Well-known member
Aug 29, 2012
12,547
The dull part of the south coast
A couple of Brum fans I spoke to (who were right in front of the action so to speak!) thought it was a perfectly good goal. No one touched Koosh, so what was it disallowed for?
 










Everest

Me
Jul 5, 2003
20,741
Southwick
Dunk was involved, ergo it was a foul (even if it wasn't)
 








Lethargic

Well-known member
Oct 11, 2006
3,511
Horsham
See channel 5 didn't even show it so that's good enough for me clearly not a goal. Back in the real world the ref was completely clueless so who knows why it was disallowed.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here