[Politics] It is time to end free speech
- Thread starter johanngull
- Start date
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
studio150
Well-known member
You may as well have a poll seeking the introduction of the Thinkpol.
[MENTION=33325]johanngull[/MENTION] This is how you should be showing your support for Tommy Robinson. There’s just no need for your misdirection; it’s really tacky.
Alf knows I profoundly disagree with a lot of what he says, and we’ve had the odd run in when I think he’s overstepped the line of acceptability, but you have to be really careful if you’re going to curtail free speech.
On that subject (free speech), Alf, personally, I don’t much like the avatar either. Hey ho, I’ll have to lump it.
1234andcounting
Well-known member
- Mar 31, 2008
- 1,609
"The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a panic."
Oliver Wendell Holmes. Fairly self explanatory in relation to Mr Robinson (although I did love 2-4-6-8 Motorway back in the day).
Oliver Wendell Holmes. Fairly self explanatory in relation to Mr Robinson (although I did love 2-4-6-8 Motorway back in the day).
daveinprague
New member
It wasnt a speech by Tommy Robinson, it was a speech from an Alt Right foreign national, read by Robinson.
Blue Valkyrie
Not seen such Bravery!
I've only ever seen him mentioned on NSC.
My 1st impression is that he's one of the biggest goons about. [emoji38]ol:
In general, yep, I agree. One caveat: a great orator can persuade joe public of the merits of his/her ideas, irrespective of the validity of the content. It’s important to always evaluate the content of what is being promoted, and not just get carried away by the emotional impact of great oratory.
hart's shirt
Well-known member
Well, quite.
Personally I'm much more concerned with the mindset of those starting threads on NSC - a broad church when it comes to most things including political ideology, but primarily not its raison d'être which is football talk - with a seemingly-deliberate agenda to inflame, antagonize and divide.
Don't ruin our NSC.
alfredmizen
Banned
- Mar 11, 2015
- 6,342
The ONLY reason it descended into violence is when muslims attacked the people that were there to ensure that tommy robinson was able to speak, i was there , that is a fact.
dingodan
New member
- Feb 16, 2011
- 10,080
alfredmizen
Banned
- Mar 11, 2015
- 6,342
Couldnt hear a thing, the journey wasnt wasted , he was able to speak.
daveinprague
New member
Not really. Martin Sellner was.
alfredmizen
Banned
- Mar 11, 2015
- 6,342
you disagree with MOST of what i say , not 'a lot' of what i say
Yes - the seemingly deliberate “agenda to inflame, antagonise and divide” of a handful of posters does, imo, go against the raison d’être of NSC. Against that, one has to weigh free speech.
Posting history plays a part for me: some folk post on football and start seemingly deliberately provocative threads. They are different, imo, to those who only start such threads. The OP has, so far, fallen into the latter category, but he’s made only 5 posts. Maybe he’s interested in football too, but just hasn’t shown it yet? This thread has certainly promoted him to the “hmmm, let’s keep an eye out” category though.
you disagree with MOST of what i say , not 'a lot' of what i say
It’s a fair cop, guv.
alfredmizen
Banned
- Mar 11, 2015
- 6,342
Dont be silly Dave , Tommy Robinson was able to speak , whether that was a speech he prepared or one written by someone else , he was there top speak , and he did, simple.
Tom Hark Preston Park
Will Post For Cash
- Jul 6, 2003
- 72,327
daveinprague
New member
Why no microphone. Did the police take it despite your protection of him?
studio150
Well-known member
Of course it's a fact, so the following must be fake
[video]https://5pillarsuk.com/2018/03/19/video-far-right-supporters-of-tommy-robinson-provoke-muslims-at-speakers-corner/[/video]