So is it the Lefty Wokerati that tries to get Gary Lineker banned from the BBC for his Tweets defending asylum seekers, or Chris Packham banned from the BBC for his public campaigns against fox-hunting.Firstly, well done for having the courage to seek alternative opinions. Far too many of the wokerati community hide behind ignore lists or spend most of their time trying to get people with different opinions banned.
Secondly, I wouldn't believe anything a moderator says re second accounts on this forum as they usually have an agenda or have no understanding of ip address identification protocols.
NSC political threads being a shining example of the above.
That notorious Left-wing Woke publication the Daily Mail is always demanding that someone or something be banned or sacked because it does not like the views or opinions expressed, and which offend 'snowflake' Daily Mail readers who don't have the resilience to be exposed to other points of view or different lifestyles. Instead, they are permanently offended and outraged, and automatically insist that "It shouldn't be allowed."
Or, in the US, those Woke Lefties getting classic books banned from libraries because they tackle racism ('To Kill a Mocking Bird), or feature 'explicit' sex scenes which offend so-called Christians - when they're not trying to ban abortion.
I think you'll find that, actually, in all the above examples, it's the Tory Right and (in the US) rabid Trump-worshipping Republicans who are determined to ban things and people they dislike and disagree with - all in the name of defending freedom, liberty and democracy, of course.
But I'm sure you won't let facts, reality or evidence get in the way of your prejudices or political agenda.
Last edited: