- Jun 27, 2012
- 14,612
- Thread starter
- #41
That Bart fella . I'm sure i saw him in the goal at the Amex last weekend.Goalkeeping options are weaker. Never sure about Steele and the new Belgian lad is an unknown.
That Bart fella . I'm sure i saw him in the goal at the Amex last weekend.Goalkeeping options are weaker. Never sure about Steele and the new Belgian lad is an unknown.
Because if we lose estupinan our season is effectively over?Are we really susceptible to injuries ? How ?
For the u21sYou've missed Louis Flower, signed today for us from Chelsea
Blimey. We have other players - right ?Because if we lose estupinan our season is effectively over?
Yes, as are others that he did mention as signing this window.For the u21s
If Milner could actually be used as a midfielder then there would be less worries about the midfield.There is window in four months time also we have no idea what Beleba will bring to the table hard to say If the midfield is weaker at this point.
That's what I think (at the moment at least). But what this doesn't take account of is the improvement of the players in our squad. The difference between Enciso a year ago and a month ago is illustrative, and we could add in no end of players to that, and not just young ones. Pervis took a while to settle for instance, and we've all seen the improvements in March.Overall it’s tough to know if we are weaker or stronger.
Sanchez——————> Verbruggen ?
Offiah———————> Milner UP
Colwill ——————-> Igor ?
Caicedo —————-> Baleba DOWN
Mac Allister ————> Dahoud DOWN
Sarmiento—————> Adingra UP
Enciso——————-> Fati UP*
Undav——————-> Pedro UP
Player for player, more upgrades than downgrades, especially in attack.
Edit. Plus a transfer window profit of circa £74m
Saved me writing the same thing.You have to say that (at the moment - until players bed in) our defence looks weaker and midfield looks less strong too - and possibly very slow. But far stronger in attack.
Agreed and dunk.Because if we lose estupinan our season is effectively over?