I don’t believe it all goes on health care though?That’s pretty much what many of us pay in NI
I don’t believe it all goes on health care though?That’s pretty much what many of us pay in NI
I don’t believe it all goes on health care though?
And the self-employed.That’s retired and unemployed people f***ed then.
The 165b cost mentioned several times on here divided by 67m population gives you around £2,400 for NHSThere are a lot of experts on here so would be good to know how true this is but I read this morning that uk health funding per head is £3042 whilst france is £3735. That's govt funding - france also has mandatory mutuelle insurance with employer funding
As for pensioners I read it is c110 euros per month out of the state pension (French state pensions are nearly double uk)
It all boils down to whether we do fund health enough in the UK and the knock ons of other benefits (I include pensions as benefits)
Exactly. Not always easy to compare systems but this website seems to give it a good go. Comparing health costs Germany in 2022 spent US$8,011 per head of population in 2022 whereas we spent US$5,493. That's about 45% more than the UK spend. Food for thought.There are a lot of experts on here so would be good to know how true this is but I read this morning that uk health funding per head is £3042 whilst france is £3735. That's govt funding - france also has mandatory mutuelle insurance with employer funding
As for pensioners I read it is c110 euros per month out of the state pension (French state pensions are nearly double uk)
It all boils down to whether we do fund health enough in the UK and the knock ons of other benefits (I include pensions as benefits)
On the other hand, the actual £180bn cost of England (also mentioned on here) divided by 56m population is £3,214 per head. The £165bn was the National Insurance take, not the health spending.The 165b cost mentioned several times on here divided by 67m population gives you around £2,400 for NHS
Germany is around double this, at £6.305,20 per head.On the other hand, the actual £180bn cost of England (also mentioned on here) divided by 56m population is £3,214 per head. The £165bn was the National Insurance take, not the health spending.
What I'm not sure about is whether all these figures which bounce around are the expenditure by the state, or whether these include privately funded and insurance funded health care as well.Germany is around double this, at £6.305,20 per head.
"Germany spends $8011 per capita on health, more than the OECD average of $4986 (USD PPP). This is equal to 12.7% of GDP, compared to 9.2% on average in the OECD."
Press here and it might help you!!!What I'm not sure about is whether all these figures which bounce around are the expenditure by the state, or whether these include privately funded and insurance funded health care as well.
Thank you. Yes it does. Good Web site.
What exactly do you mean that 'admin' staff are blocking routes to medical staff? You make it sound like medical staff are possibly sitting around not working to full capacity?What most people seem to forget is that even when you go private, most of the time for proper surgery or healthcare you’re being pushed through the NHS anyway, you’re just getting there quicker than someone without private. What this means is that it becomes a game for the rich, as much has over the past 14 years.
Now I’m lucky - I have private healthcare through work, and I’ve used the NHS very successfully on a number of occasions. Alternatively, my wife works in the NHS and regularly bemoans the lack of staff, the incredible stress due to poor resourcing, but also highlights how incredible most people are.
What is clear to many though, is that we simply aren’t training enough people for key medical roles, which is why we have so many admin staff blocking routes to the medical staff who are in much shorter supply… obviously our political choices over the past 10 years haven’t helped retain key staff either, nor has our government’s decision to take away much of the funding, or to continue to pay staff really poorly compared to many private sector jobs that have much less responsibility and stress.
So, is it fit for purpose… that’s up for debate. What’s clear is that the people in charge are running it into the ground, and purposefully outsourcing key elements to the private sector isn’t proving to offer solutions. And until we deal with the labour issues, nothing will get much better, especially with our aging population.