Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Is it time for dick Knight to step down
- Thread starter vulture
- Start date
Green Cross Code Man
Wunt be druv
No.
..
..
Lord Bracknell
On fire
Is that "no" to Time for DK to step down?
or "no" to Happy with the way he's running the club?
My fault for merging the threads, I guess.
:thud:
or "no" to Happy with the way he's running the club?
My fault for merging the threads, I guess.
:thud:
Easy 10
Brain dead MUG SHEEP
Christ, do we have to have one of these EVERY day ?
Yoda
English & European
Clearly not, as there is no realistic alternative.
Finchley Seagull
Well-known member
As ever if you brought a sensible alternative with the clubs interest at heart and money to back them, then it might be worth debating. As it is, with no realstic alternative, what is the point?
Lokki 7
WSU
Your tatoo looks SHIT.
No def not
Barrel of Fun
Abort, retry, fail
Is it time for him to step down? No. Who is the alternative, Vulture? The present board (you know, the ones that are keeping the club afloat) seem to be happy with his stewardship and have shown no desire to front the club themselves.
We are reaching a critical stage of the Stadium process and realistically it could be suicide to start juggling the board about, it would certainly delay the stadium, of that I am certain.
Dick has been flamed for stating names in the past, flamed for not talking and now flamed by some for stating that the board acknowledge the need to strengthen and are in talks with five players. The fact that must be held onto is that, in respect to the transfer market, we are impotent and have the penetration levels of a Dormouses cock. We are not able to offer deals that are too good to turn down, so we have to work with the scraps. Should the board be chastised for their lack of funds? No. I must have missed all those multi-millionaires who are willing to put so much time and effort into a relatively thankless task.
Come what may, it could be a lot worse, look at Luton for example. Of course it will be disappointing if we are unable to sign all our target, but the club will not fold and we move ever closer to Falmer.
I never quite understand this attitude of ripping the board to shreds when the vast majority of deals are done in the last week of the window. Still, if it alleviates a bit of tension and makes one feel better...
We are reaching a critical stage of the Stadium process and realistically it could be suicide to start juggling the board about, it would certainly delay the stadium, of that I am certain.
Dick has been flamed for stating names in the past, flamed for not talking and now flamed by some for stating that the board acknowledge the need to strengthen and are in talks with five players. The fact that must be held onto is that, in respect to the transfer market, we are impotent and have the penetration levels of a Dormouses cock. We are not able to offer deals that are too good to turn down, so we have to work with the scraps. Should the board be chastised for their lack of funds? No. I must have missed all those multi-millionaires who are willing to put so much time and effort into a relatively thankless task.
Come what may, it could be a lot worse, look at Luton for example. Of course it will be disappointing if we are unable to sign all our target, but the club will not fold and we move ever closer to Falmer.
I never quite understand this attitude of ripping the board to shreds when the vast majority of deals are done in the last week of the window. Still, if it alleviates a bit of tension and makes one feel better...
saltash seagull
New member
you do need to have some one to come in 1st
Brighton Breezy
New member
People need to read the poll. To me those results say 70 per cent of people are not happy with the way he is running the club.
I suspect some of those people meant to VOTE No to him stepping down.
I am not massively happy with things and think now would be a good time to admit he cannot take us much further than this BUT shouldn't step down until someone is found to take us to the next level.
I suspect some of those people meant to VOTE No to him stepping down.
I am not massively happy with things and think now would be a good time to admit he cannot take us much further than this BUT shouldn't step down until someone is found to take us to the next level.
Do you understand the meaning of 'statistically significant' though Richie (and I'm not referring to your 'Page 3 Idol' thread here BTW)?
Yes I'm happy with how he's running this club, and no its not time for him to step down. He is the perfect person to get the funding and build us a stadium. As for when its finished and he has different challenges then we'll ask ourselves then....
Anyone who thnks we should ask these questions before Falmer is finished is attempting to kneecap the club.
I voted yes to the poll as the poll title asked am I happy the title question asked for an answer which contradicted the first.....whats the point in that??
Anyone who thnks we should ask these questions before Falmer is finished is attempting to kneecap the club.
I voted yes to the poll as the poll title asked am I happy the title question asked for an answer which contradicted the first.....whats the point in that??
Last edited:
Hang on - the poll question is different to the title of the thread question - so the results are wrong either way.
Scotty Mac
New member
- Jul 13, 2003
- 24,405
correct - he cant step down until there is somebody ready to take over. but he needs to be going out and searching for that person
Skint Gull
New member
Yeah if this is merged threads it is now very misleading and should really be got rid of. I answered the question on the thread title and not on the poll itself