On which basis?
on the basis that other higher primate also eat meat and we have canine teeth which serve no other purpose. we also cannot synthesise several proteins and vitamins that we get from meat (some are available in veg but require copious amounts). we can eat raw meat just not an awful lot of it, and possibly less now than a few tens of thousand years ago as we have developed a diet with more grains from farming. we do often wake consumed with the desire to eat meat especially in pregnancy. we have adapted to be flexible in our diet.
Please list the proteins and vitamins.
We have "canine" teeth that serve no other purpose? Rather poor response to the extensive anatomical and physiological evidence that points against your assertion
we have not evolved as carnivores
We do often wake consumed with the desire to eat (raw) meat? Really?
Iron, Calcium, Zinc, some of the B vitamins. i dont recall the proteins, they can be metobolised from others, but its easier to get them direct. in some cases the form of a mineral in vegtables are less suitable for us than the meat form, particularly Iron. basically eating meat is a really good way to get pre-processed high density nutrition.
so there is a purpose then? herbivores have canines?
who said that we have? omnivores, we eat everything. some anatomy points to herbivores, some to carnivores. this isnt recent and its shown in our close primate cousins.
did i say that? why are you distorting things? i said we can eat raw meat and that we do crave meat. my sister turned from 10 year vegetarian to carnivore overnight when pregnant, indeed it was the cravings for meat that made her suspect she had a bun in the oven.
The overwhelming evidence is that we evolved as herbivores/frugivores; your single physiological rebutal based on our canine teeth being slightly longer than the rest could equally be used to support the assertion that we are vampire descendants.
funny how such a significant physiological attribute is so easily dismissed. funny how the point that our primate cousins also eat meat is utterly ignored. back to the main point however, is there has been evidence of hundreds of thousands of years (going on millions), which covers man and pre-man ancestors, of meat eating. there are theories that suggest eating meat in increased quantities made us evolve, and this began before advent of controled fire. we werent "designed" to do alot of things (like standing up and child birth apparently) but we get on with them rather well.
Back to the main point however, you originally asserted that "we are intended to eat meat" and now say that there is evidence to support "hundreds of thousands of years (going on millions)" of meat eating. What is this evidence?
i wasnt going to bother, but since it took 5 seconds to type a search, heres a stab at it. down there somewhere a mention of Homo habilis, which are reckoned to have used tools for butchery.
i wasnt going to bother, but since it took 5 seconds to type a search, heres a stab at it. down there somewhere a mention of Homo habilis, which are reckoned to have used tools for butchery.