Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Is Blair, Thatcher in disguise



hans kraay fan club

The voice of reason.
Helpful Moderator
Mar 16, 2005
62,769
Chandlers Ford
Les Biehn said:

I'd just like to point out, that I'm not really into sucking bums, particularly not Meado's having read the 'following through' thread.:)
 




London Calling said:
Of course Falklands is about oil, its the closest place to the untapped oil resrves of Antartica, and the reason why the Argies wanted it.


Why else would we have kept it? When we handed over all our other colonies, except the startegically important ones such as Gilbraltar and the Falklands.

We were of the Argentine plans, we had secret service, we had troop movement intelligence and we waited and waited, no warnings, no sending over a massive protectorate force to deter the Argies.

No we did nothing. We let them evade and then we went to war.

Political expendiency that costs lives. And now Blair despite the moral blackness of this episode, states that - with all the known evidence, on how corrupt this endeavour was - He says he would have done the same.


Well he probably would have, but I hope that a person with some moral dignity would take a diffrent approach.

Rant 2 over.


LC

Perhaps the Falklands ARE "about oil", maybe that is why we want to keep them - but that is NOT the reason why it was important to defend them. The war was about the un-diplomatic and aggressive invasion of our property - and I don't care what the significance or insignificance is of the holding as far as it's wealth - we HAVE to protect our properties and holdings.

NO part of our empire, no matter what you think of it's mineral or strategic wealth, is allowable to be taken by force! The implications to all our other protectorates, our subjects, and ultimately to our own country, would be too terrible to contemplate. That, LC, means a whole lot more than an oilfield!
 


Grendel

New member
Jul 28, 2005
3,251
Seaford
Simster said:
And what of John Major? Did we get into any wars under his leadership? And he stabalised the economy too.

He took us into the First Gulf War, and I'm not sure that Black Wednesday quite counts as stabilising the economy.
 


bigc

New member
Jul 5, 2003
5,740
I hate it when the figure of Blair taking us into 4 or 5 wars(whatever it is) is quoted at us.

Fair enough I was a big objector to Iraq, but I find it hard to find fault with the NATO action in Kosovo, especially with us having the hinsight of what occured in Bosnia earlier that decade.

I'm not defending Blair, but the 5(or whatever the figure was) wars is misleading.
 






Simster said:
What an absolute crock of shit. The tories cornered that particular market throughout the '80s and '90s. As mentioned earlier, it was the tories who preached family values whilst shagging anyone but their own spouses. I couldn't care less what people get up to, but don't preach to the rest of us about family values if you're the promiscuous sort FFS!
I didn't say the tories in the 80s and 90s were clean, but wasn't it Tony Blair who said he would be "whiter than white", and "purer than pure" etc etc, and making a reference to the driven snow?

And I don't recall any Conservative PMs being interview by the police in a criminal investigation, do you?
 
Last edited:












Simster

"the man's an arse"
Jul 7, 2003
54,955
Surrey
Grendel said:
He took us into the First Gulf War, and I'm not sure that Black Wednesday quite counts as stabilising the economy.
Be fair, I did mention that Lamont was a cretin and that Major stabalised the economy when Clark was made Chancellor.
 




Simster

"the man's an arse"
Jul 7, 2003
54,955
Surrey
Mr C said:
And I don't recall any Conservative PMs being interview by the police in a criminal investigation, do you?
You can't tar him with anything simply because of an interview. And btw, I can't recall ANY Labour MPs spending time in PRISON.

The tories were pretty damn far from whiter than white. It was sleezeville every year with them running the country and make no mistake.
 


Stinky Kat

Tripping
Oct 27, 2004
3,382
Catsfield
in 1997 ther British people gave blair the remit to change our country back into a sharing community with values where people meant more than the pound. Blair and his cronies decided to f*** the working class over and lost the opportunity we gave them. he is worse than thatcher because we all knew she is evil but he did his crimes, iraq and cash for honours under the guise of the labour Party. Shame on him.
 






Icy Gull

Back on the rollercoaster
Jul 5, 2003
72,015
Maggie was upfront whatever you thought of her., Blair is just plain slimy and underhand and dishonest with no redeeeming features whatsoever. he also happens to be a Tory in disguise which is probably his biggest sell out,
 
Last edited:


Simster said:
You can't tar him with anything simply because of an interview. And btw, I can't recall ANY Labour MPs spending time in PRISON.

The tories were pretty damn far from whiter than white. It was sleezeville every year with them running the country and make no mistake.

A lot of the Labour MPs are not so bad... it's the leadership and associated cronies which give me cause for concern. I think there is an air of corruption (and that's putting it mildly) that we've never experienced before.
 




Yorkie

Sussex born and bred
Jul 5, 2003
32,367
dahn sarf
London Calling said:
Of course Falklands is about oil, its the closest place to the untapped oil resrves of Antartica, and the reason why the Argies wanted it.


Why else would we have kept it? When we handed over all our other colonies, except the startegically important ones such as Gilbraltar and the Falklands.

We were of the Argentine plans, we had secret service, we had troop movement intelligence and we waited and waited, no warnings, no sending over a massive protectorate force to deter the Argies.

No we did nothing. We let them evade and then we went to war.



As someone who has relatives and friends in the Falklands (I don't mean in the military) that is a load of complete and utter rubbish.
 






Grendel

New member
Jul 28, 2005
3,251
Seaford
Simster said:
Be fair, I did mention that Lamont was a cretin and that Major stabalised the economy when Clark was made Chancellor.

You did indeed, which is true to some extent but don't forget who ruined the economy in the first place - Major was (allegedly) all for staying in the ERM to the death as much as Lamont was. The recovery was down to Clarke. Whilst I'm far from a Conservative supporter, I honestly believe the worst thing that party has done in recent years was not electing Calrke as leader . The best thing for this country at the moment, politically, would be to have a credible opposition party and the Tories have blown it, on two occassions by selecting complete non-entities.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here