Paxton Dazo
Up The Spurs.
- Mar 11, 2007
- 9,719
As borne out by the PL away table. Spuds 10 away wins already. Light years ahead of this awful Arsenal squad.
View attachment 96053
'Spuds'
I do hope you're not a grown man.
As borne out by the PL away table. Spuds 10 away wins already. Light years ahead of this awful Arsenal squad.
View attachment 96053
I would fancy us more to beat Man Utd than Spurs if we are going to get a shock win from somewhere.
Yes.
Beat Spurs at home on Tuesday, and I'll take my football boots to the home game against Utd and streak.
Remember we played pretty well against Spurs at Wembley who only took the lead via a freak goal from their full back from the touchline. Also Harry Kane did not score and their clinching goal came right at the end. Repeat and who knows.
The only way the Albion will get anything from the game is if Spurs rest all their first team squad, under 23's, and under 18's.
Fingers crossed BG wins a fans competition to play with his hero Gary Mabbutt at centre back, although I'm fairly sure they'll still have a yard of pace on Murray.
A sound thrashing?We are capable of getting something from the game imo.
A sound thrashing?
Very disappointed yesterday, but having watched it again this morning even Roy thought Palace were fortunate to get all three points.
Obviously the Corona was flowing last night but when I even suggested that we could still shock Tottenham and win on Tuesday, I was met with laughter.
Stranger things have happened haven’t they?
And whose to say Murray won’t deliver?
Please Harry CANE can I have your SHIRT please
SINGED
ENREST aged 13 1/2
It looks likely we will end up 17h this season. Maybe 36 points with a gf of minus 25. Odds being relegated now 8 ro 1 from 16 to 1. We need something from our last 5 games and learn a lot as 9 seasons out of 10, 36 points would have you relegated
Looking at the odds now, it seems like a lot of people have been lumping on us to go down I the last 12 hours. Directly after the game yesterday you could still get 16s which probably reflects more the actual probability.