FatSuperman
Well-known member
- Feb 25, 2016
- 2,923
Bear in mind that the definition of continents are not following some strict guidelines, it's just what people 'normally' use, hence why there are sometimes 7 (or 8 with the new one). And sometimes only 4 (Afro-Eurasia, America, Antarctica, Australia.
New Zealand straddles the edge between the Australian tectonic plate and the Pacific plate. One island per plate, roughly.
And certainly some argue that tectonic plates/continental shelves should be used to define continents. I prefer that myself in some ways.
Or just mutter it under your breath as the continents are listed.
“Oh yeah I know them all; Africa, Asia, Europe, North America, South America, Australia and Antarctica... andstupidlittlefkinnewzealand, crying in the corner with Pluto the dwarf”
There's the whole flora and fauna that only occur there which also factors into it being its own continent.
No. Australia is a country (special emphasis on removing the O). Australasia is a continent.
No it isn't. Australia is a country which is part of Australasia.
Australasia (Oceania)
Well my understanding was that the above is all wrong. Australia is a continent.Nope. It’s a country in Australasia
But that would make Madagascar a continent for sure.
As i said its part of the equation. It proves the land mass has been apart from other land masses for a long long time. Madagascar is a lot smaller land mass though. It could fit into mainland Australia 13-14 times.
So land mass in size might play a part as well.
Well my understanding was that the above is all wrong. Australia is a continent.
Australasia and Oceana are regions that include New Zealand, and New Zealand is not on any continent.
Yes, there are so many ways it could be done. But none definitive, which is rather surprising.
I've not heard that before. Have you got a link to a definition of 'continent' that says having its own flora and fauna is relevant?There's the whole flora and fauna that only occur there which also factors into it being its own continent.
Added I think the indigenous peoples of Australia are a strong case to to put forth in any such discussion as to why it's a continent.
Unlike NZ where it's Islander peoples do share similarities with other Islander nations the Australian Aboriginal is their own unique look.
I think one of the issues is the number of different names and terms for that area. Australia, Australasia, Oceania, Sahul, Australinea, Meganesia! What we really need is one universal name to rule them all. A new standard, as it were.
I nominate Juan to decide.
But Africa is one continent even though the Arabs in the north are very different to many other African nations' peoples. So I'm not sure that works.
But Africa is one continent even though the Arabs in the north are very different to many other African nations' peoples. So I'm not sure that works.
have you heard of Gondwanaland....?? google it, you may find it interesting.