Alex Alex Dawson oo! oo!
Primary data is fact
What's £1.5m on players compared to £90m on a stadium? Funny how there's more concern about the transfer budget than there was the stadium. When I raised my concerns about the stadium funding I was cut down by a huge consensus that it wasn't a problem. The gamble seems to be paying off at the moment anyway - our revenue has gone through the roof. So who cares? Well I think we all should really, I think if our history tells us one thing its that we should question everything. At some time in the future unpopular questions should be asked about our future: What if TB loses interest? (He won't is not an acceptable answer) What if he needs the loan money back immediately? Are we budgeting for a sustainable future? Are we gambling on promotion? etc
Still, we should by deafult all be happy and trust the board. We know their intentions are good.
If TB wants out or needs some cash then he could sell some shares in the football club or stadium company or maybe even a majority in the entire stadium itself (assuming it's still set up as wnhen I last looked at CH). In the latter case the Club could continue and rent use of the stadium from the new owners but then it might well renting from Stadium Company now. What is/was your problem with the funding of the £90M capital investment - is it the scale, repayment, type of loan?