Wouldn't a National ID Card help with all sorts of issues? Why are people so opposed to them, I just look at it like a mini-passport.
Sigh.Wouldn't a National ID Card help with all sorts of issues? Why are people so opposed to them, I just look at it like a mini-passport.
Inference? How about we actually deal with what I've said explicitly and repeatedly, namely that I don't believe there is widescale electoral fraud and, like others on this thread, have high confidence in our current electoral system.
My opposition is not to ID , my opposition is based on how and why it's currently being looked at when all actual measures of election fraud are miniscule for example, 600 in 30 million votes cast in 2019. Its pretty clear this is a move by the government to disenfranchise people rather than to sort out fraud.Wouldn't a National ID Card help with all sorts of issues? Why are people so opposed to them, I just look at it like a mini-passport.
Still better than just wandering in off the street, glancing at a list, saying a name and voting for someone else, who may even be dead . . . .Those other forms of ID are not accepted as ID (other than for the purpose of borrowing library books, using a cash point, buying a train ticket, etc.). Even a paper driving licence is not accepted as ID. Nor is a bus pass.
You don't know it's not an issue as there's absolutely nothing to say or prove either waySigh.
People aren’t opposed to them for ease of identification. They are opposed to the Tory’s introducing them to disenfranchise people that are unlikely to vote Tory. And that they are lying about electoral fraud. Which is not an issue.
Is it that hard a concept to grasp?
We do know it’s not a big issue. I posted the figures earlier.You don't know it's not an issue as there's absolutely nothing to say or prove either way
the fact the tories keep shafting everyone AND winning very much suggests otherwise.
TBH I don't think it's a big issue, but it is one . . . Something needs to be done and its called compulsory voting, with a 'none of these twats' box
It's also from the same set of people who would call themselves 'libertarians' and whinged constamtly about mandatory facemasks and lockdowns as an infringement of their civil liberties and also call government intererence the 'Nanny state'?Sigh.
People aren’t opposed to them for ease of identification. They are opposed to the Tory’s introducing them to disenfranchise people that are unlikely to vote Tory. And that they are lying about electoral fraud. Which is not an issue.
Is it that hard a concept to grasp?
Too many people kid themselves about this government. Probably because the alternative, facing up to the truth, is just too scary.It's also from the same set of people who would call themselves 'libertarians' and whinged constamtly about mandatory facemasks and lockdowns as an infringement of their civil liberties and also call government intererence the 'Nanny state'?
Not really. There's no evidence that that happens, and certainly not on a scale of any significance.Still better than just wandering in off the street, glancing at a list, saying a name and voting for someone else, who may even be dead . . . .
Once again - that doesn't prove anything.We do know it’s not a big issue. I posted the figures earlier.
I have explained it to you before, using your strange speeding analogy. Unfortunately, I cannot understand it for you.Once again - that doesn't prove anything.
It was completely bizarre how you posted that to me earlier, all triumphantly, as if I don't possess the technical skills to hop onto Google and type in a simple search query.
You can no more prove that there is not widescale election fraud than I can prove there is.
I drove my son to school today. I saw him walk through the gates. A few times when I opened the "Find My" app on my iPhone it showed the location of his phone as being in the school grounds and he was there when I picked him up at the end of the day.
So, do I know he was at school today? No, I don't. I have a very high level of confidence he was, but I don't actually know that with 100% certainty. That's where we are with electoral fraud. I completely agree that it is very unlikely that it happens on any kind of scale, but I can't prove that, and nor can you.
Bless.I have explained it to you before, using your strange speeding analogy. Unfortunately, I cannot understand it for you.
Bless.
It’s a difference of opinion. Get over it .Bless.
Without trying to sound like an insensitive ****, if someone is suffering that badly from dementia, should they be able to vote?Have you ever tried getting somebody with dementia into a phone booth, align them within the camera limit, and them getting them to look at the screen and sit still long enough to get an acceptable photo.
I tried, but I couldn't do it.
So I can't renew her passport which is now out of date and her driving licence was revoked ages ago. None of those would be acceptable so what is another alternative option?
Please explain our difference of opinion, remembering:It’s a difference of opinion. Get over it .
I am done explaining.Please explain our difference of opinion, remembering:
1. I don't believe there is large-scale election fraud in the UK.
2. I'm not advocating for mandatory ID for voting in the UK.