The way to determine whether it was intentional or not without reading Barton's mind is by asking a different question: Was it AVOIDABLE?
Well, yes, it was. After hurdling Kayal, it would have been easy for Barton to use his right leg to take the weight and avoid the leg, but instead he let himself land on him. Indefensible, why on earth the pundits let Dyche try and talk his way out of admitting Barton should have been off was ridiculous. They put him in front of that clip, and as soon as its clear he didn't have the class to concede the obvious they should have laughed at how deluded he is. And clearly its not Hughton's nature, but you do wonder how he can say he didn't think it was intentional and the battle between the two was nothing more than 'competitive'. If Pawson clearly wasn't going to, someone has got to protect the players...
I would be truly embarrassed to have Sean Dyche as manager of a club I supported.
I have heard him defending the indefensible for so long now that every interview he gives is comical and predictable. You are right. He has no class and that's why Watford shipped him out. He clearly lacks any maturity to present a balanced view on anything. At Turf Moor, he described our opening goal ( catching them cold from the kick off, with a well worked move ) as a succession of lucky breaks. He described their gift of a penalty as a stonewall and clear decision.
I thought Eddie Howe was bad. One-eyed in the extreme. This guy beats him hands down. No mention of how his team were outplayed for long periods on Saturday, no credit to Brighton at all. No, Burnley were the better team in the second half and deserved to win. Only denied that victory due to a poor decision.
Dyche is child-like in his immaturity and lets his profession down with ill-judged and one-sided comments.
The really sad thing is that he'll get a standing ovation from Burnley fans tomorrow night.
Twisted
Best forget it, leave karma to send him or stretcher him off.
All about Birmingham now.
Yep he went down hugely in my estimation on saturday, I understand a Manager will back his own side to the hilt, but not an ounce of credit given to the opposition and believing his side were the better team is quite remarkable.
Everyone in the ground, even the away end knew Burnley had got away with a point at the end of the day, and that all the football was played by us.
What gets me is the argument that because it was Barton the assumption of guilt is greater than if it was any other player, because of his reputation, which is deemed as unfair.
But isn't that the point? Barton has made his career out of being a thug and he is far more likely to be guilty on that basis. On the law of averages excluding the goalie, there was a 1 in 10 chance for any of the Burnley players to commit that foul - but it was Barton.....
I'd say intentional as well, however....... It strikes me that football has changed a lot since I started going to watch the Albion at the Goldstone, this was when men were men, it was a hard game watched by working class lads and men and a time when the North Stand would openly applaud Jimmy Case for employing very similar tactics. Unfortunately now football has become very sanitised in the main, theatrics from our European cousins and the audience joining in, baying for a yellow or red at every incident. Yes it was dirty and yes it was intentional but Barton was our pantomime villain for the day.
10 people think it was accidental?
Jeez
Okay, that's Barton, Naylor, Pawson, Stevie Wonder, Ray Charles and five others then!
c) he's a c_unt