Inauguration of the USA 45th President - Donald Trump

[alfredmizen]

I don't believe you wish to spend a slow hour being taught basic GCSE level Sociology. You could enroll on Open University, perhaps?

The expected non answer , i thought it would be along the lines of ''if you dont know then i'm not going to tell you'' but this is pretty much in the same vein , its not racist or sexist, so you gave me the expected swerve.

 

[Tyrone Biggums]

I don't believe you wish to spend a slow hour being taught basic GCSE level Sociology. You could enroll on Open University, perhaps?

Or you could study a real science like biology, learn there's no such thing as race and skip the waste of time that is sociology studies.

 

[knocky1]

I'm not sure if that statement is ignorant, racist,sexist, irrelevant or all of them.

The expected non answer , i thought it would be along the lines of ''if you dont know then i'm not going to tell you'' but this is pretty much in the same vein , its not racist or sexist, so you gave me the expected swerve.

I was asking for guidance from the sages of NSC in the first place. So two are ruled out. Was it ignorant or irrelevant?

 

[alfredmizen]

I was asking for guidance from the sages of NSC in the first place. So two are ruled out. Was it ignorant or irrelevant?

Maybe both , i'd like to know how you come to the conclusion it may be racist or sexist ?

 

[W.C.]

The fact is the vast majority of these "experts" who live and work in the US political media got it wrong. Thus proving living in the US means nothing when making a comment on the political landscape of the US.

You're proving quite a lot today. Unfortunately it's none of the points you want to make.

 

[knocky1]

Maybe both , i'd like to know how you come to the conclusion it may be racist or sexist ?

My Mum told me that if I play hard to get I will have more trolls interested in me.

 

[Tyrone Biggums]

You're proving quite a lot today. Unfortunately it's none of the points you want to make.

Oh but I did prove my point.

I proved living in a nation does not equate to being an expert or being factually correct on said nations culture or issues. Just as not living in a nation disqualifies someone from not being very well informed and knowledgeable of a foreign nation.

 

[CHAPPERS]

This gets better by the day

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...-house-website-plug-for-jewelry-a7539326.html

 

[alfredmizen]

My Mum told me that if I play hard to get I will have more trolls interested in me.

I wont bother asking again , we both know its neither racist nor sexist , you just had the usual do gooder reaction any time someone makes derogatory comments about a black person, the fact is that the comments didnt mention her race or sex thats why you CANT answer.

 

[knocky1]

I wont bother asking again , we both know its neither racist nor sexist , you just had the usual do gooder reaction any time someone makes derogatory comments about a black person, the fact is that the comments didnt mention her race or sex thats why you CANT answer.

Don't do the Sociology O- Level. NSC wouldn't be the same with you being humanitarian.

 

[alfredmizen]

Don't do the Sociology O- Level. NSC wouldn't be the same with you being humanitarian.

youre fooling nobody with these swerve posts , youd be better off not answering.

 

[beorhthelm]

This gets better by the day

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...-house-website-plug-for-jewelry-a7539326.html

thats media making mountian out of a worm casting.

 

[W.C.]

Oh but I did prove my point.

I proved living in a nation does not equate to being an expert or being factually correct on said nations culture or issues. Just as not living in a nation disqualifies someone from not being very well informed and knowledgeable of a foreign nation.

Congratulations. You should get in touch with the Smithsonian, I'm sure they'd be eager to publish.

 

[DavidinSouthampton]

Millions may have voted for him, but more voted for Hillary.


Yes true but you delight in leaving out the obvious. The electoral college rules. It will change in the future maybe but, the presidency was fairly won within the current rules. Inconvenient I know.

I am well aware of the Electoral College rules, and I was merely responding to a post that seemed to me to imply that Trump won a straight majority, when he didn't. I'm not delighting in leaving out the obvious at all. I was merely stating a fact .

 

[Tyrone Biggums]

Congratulations. You should get in touch with the Smithsonian, I'm sure they'd be eager to publish.

I'm not a liberal Hollywood celebrity, I don't seek the fame and fortune that comes with it.

 

[W.C.]

I'm not a liberal Hollywood celebrity, I don't seek the fame and fortune that comes with it.

That's relevant, thanks.

 

[CHAPPERS]

This page worries me most. Not one mention of renewables which actually could reinvigorate the economy and free them from OPEC. It really beggars belief that he wants to burn MORE fossil fuels, not less.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/america-first-energy

 

[Tyrone Biggums]

That's relevant, thanks.

It's all your post was worth

 

[The Clamp]

I don't believe you wish to spend a slow hour being taught basic GCSE level Sociology. You could enroll on Open University, perhaps?

 

[BadFish]

Fine, you cared enough to reply/post though.

Just adding a bit of balance to your posts SM.



https://tedtheeconomist.wordpress.co...-infographics/