Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

In 2015 Labour suggested they'd scrap A27 upgrades if elected







GT49er

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Feb 1, 2009
49,205
Gloucester
FFS what do we pay our road taxes for ???

If you can afford to buy the right sort of new car, you don't pay road tax. If, however, you can only afford a cheap old car because you don't earn very much, the tories will happily sting you for road tax; it's the opposite of a progressive tax system. They probably love it ..........
 


Diablo

Well-known member
Sep 22, 2014
4,389
lewes
If you can afford to buy the right sort of new car, you don't pay road tax. If, however, you can only afford a cheap old car because you don't earn very much, the tories will happily sting you for road tax; it's the opposite of a progressive tax system. They probably love it ..........


To prove your point you have failed to mention that small cars pay very little....Whilst those horrible rich people pay huge amounts of road tax for their Jaguars,Range Rovers..Rollers etc
 


GT49er

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Feb 1, 2009
49,205
Gloucester
To prove your point you have failed to mention that small cars pay very little....Whilst those horrible rich people pay huge amounts of road tax for their Jaguars,Range Rovers..Rollers etc
Plenty of tax free Lexus's, and Jaguars come pretty cheap, road tax wise (free in the first year, £20 a year thereafter) Take a look: http://www.nextgreencar.com/car-tax/make-model/jaguar/all-models/. A ten year old Nissan Micra costs seven times as much, so you will see that I was omitting nothing to 'prove my point'.
 


brakespear

Doctor Worm
Feb 24, 2009
12,326
Sleeping on the roof
If you can afford to buy the right sort of new car, you don't pay road tax. If, however, you can only afford a cheap old car because you don't earn very much, the tories will happily sting you for road tax; it's the opposite of a progressive tax system. They probably love it ..........

To prove your point you have failed to mention that small cars pay very little....Whilst those horrible rich people pay huge amounts of road tax for their Jaguars,Range Rovers..Rollers etc

what-if-i-wasnt-like-sure-if-serious-or-not-serious.jpg
 




Yoda

English & European
Found it! :)

https://www.westsussex.gov.uk/media/1599/a27_route_strategy_presentation_v2.pdf

This is a 150 odd page detailed study from Atkins consulting engineers. From page 97 onwards it gives detailed drawings of the proposed improvements along the route. No by-passes in site, which is what all 3 really need. :down:

Seeing as for some reason I cannot edit this post now, this (https://www.westsussex.gov.uk/media/1600/a27_routestrategy_finalreport_d8_v2point1b.pdf) is the final report. The (same) detailed drawings start from page 102, but a little bigger.

I cannot see how the proposal for Lancing Manor roundabout will improve things, as with that signalled crossroads will only work if one set of lights is green at a time.
 


ROSM

Well-known member
Dec 26, 2005
6,793
Just far enough away from LDC
To be clear, the only part of the current plans shelved in the arundel bypass and largely due to environmental concerns which need sorting before a final route can be decided on. All other aspects of the current plan will go ahead.

But let's not let the truth get in the way here
 


Cosmic Joker

The Motorik
Apr 14, 2010
570
Chichester
Seeing as for some reason I cannot edit this post now, this (https://www.westsussex.gov.uk/media/1600/a27_routestrategy_finalreport_d8_v2point1b.pdf) is the final report. The (same) detailed drawings start from page 102, but a little bigger.

I cannot see how the proposal for Lancing Manor roundabout will improve things, as with that signalled crossroads will only work if one set of lights is green at a time.

That document is not the current DfT / Highways England major schemes for Chichester, Arundel and Worthing-Lancing. It is a report prepared for West Sussex County Council on what interim improvements for the A27 would be possible to be implemented relatively quickly if major schemes were a long time coming. None of the designs in that report are committed to be constructed, as far as I am aware, but it was a useful exercise in raising the profile of A27 issues. It was published in summer 2013 and this was followed by Govt confirming that there would be a major scheme for Chichester Bypass in December 2013 and Arundel and Worthing-Lancing 12 months later. The general election does put all back up for grabs though. If Labour do get in and put Arundel Bypass back on hold, then the designs in that report for the Arundel and Crossbush junctions may be more likely to happen in my view as a sort of compromise.
 




Brighton Mod

Its All Too Beautiful
It's certainly not what the Tory Secretary of State has promised the parish councils between Lewes and Polegate. Neither he nor the Highways Agency think dualling is necessary.

Linking Portsmouth, Brighton, Eastbourne and Hastings with a combined population of 2m with surrounding areas with 1950s roads is business inhibiting.Politicians not to be and never should be trusted!!
 


Pavilionaire

Well-known member
Jul 7, 2003
31,278
To be clear, the only part of the current plans shelved in the arundel bypass and largely due to environmental concerns which need sorting before a final route can be decided on. All other aspects of the current plan will go ahead.

But let's not let the truth get in the way here

So shelving just the Arundel by-pass and some work on the A358 is going to provide enough money to freeze rail fairs NATIONALLY for a YEAR?

It's ironic that the A358 upgrade is close to the Yeovil seat that Lib Dem David Laws will be fighting, the same David Laws that sat down and talked with Labour after the 2010 election before rejecting them for the Tories. It is also conceivable that he could be part of the Lib Dem team negotiating with Labour re coalition on 8th May.
 






Napper

Well-known member
Jul 9, 2003
24,464
Sussex
To be clear, the only part of the current plans shelved in the arundel bypass and largely due to environmental concerns which need sorting before a final route can be decided on. All other aspects of the current plan will go ahead.

But let's not let the truth get in the way here

Few conservatives on here who now have egg on their face to accompany their wet underwear
 


Seagull73

Sienna's Heaven
Jul 26, 2003
3,382
Not Lewes
It's certainly not what the Tory Secretary of State has promised the parish councils between Lewes and Polegate. Neither he nor the Highways Agency think dualling is necessary.

None of whom I suspect are locals, because when you look at traffic flows on that road now, it is a barmy conclusion.
 








HeaviestTed

I’m eating
NSC Patron
Mar 23, 2023
2,138
It is always about the south, what about us northerners up near Haywards heath? We need to start seriously thinking about the whole county not just the southern edge of Sussex.
 




Guinness Boy

Tofu eating wokerati
Helpful Moderator
NSC Patron
Jul 23, 2003
37,384
Up and Coming Sunny Portslade
It is always about the south, what about us northerners up near Haywards heath? We need to start seriously thinking about the whole county not just the southern edge of Sussex.
There’s always levelling up, if there’s any change from building a seafront park in deprived West Hove.
 




Harry Wilson's tackle

Harry Wilson's Tackle
NSC Patron
Oct 8, 2003
56,270
Faversham
View attachment 183881

I mean, the Tories just talk in such childish, incendiary language now don't they? "Declared war"? Really?
But Labour sabotaged Brexit and they stink to high heaven (so I read earlier on the Brexit thread).
 


Harry Wilson's tackle

Harry Wilson's Tackle
NSC Patron
Oct 8, 2003
56,270
Faversham
Sadly the Arundel bypass won't be built anytime soon.
Is this the one they were talking about building in the 1960s?

Edit: I though that was built years ago. Why do they need a new one? I remember having to drive right through the town to go west when I was a kid.

1718187676736.png
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here