Mr Bridger
Sound of the suburbs
Not being a doctor, but my diagnosis would be an overactive .....
Knife & fork
Knife & fork
Sounds like @Nibble is on the money here.
You're hardly into the realms of stomach stapling by the sounds of it. It sounds like you are just having to do exactly what all good parents do - spot a potential problem heading in your childs direction, and do your best to avert it. In this case, keep away from too many sweets, chocs, processed and fatty food. Also stuff like rice and bread don't help. But of course, you can't be too heavy handed either.
Hormones do play a big part in kids growth. As you say, girls tend to store fat (which is why it's called puppy fat) just before puberty, as their bodies need to reach a certain weight to start it off. Anorexic girls periods stop because they drop below that optimum weight.
Then they have a growth spurt and appear skinny again.
Fresh food prepared and keep off the processed foods, and most kids will grow normally. One big food con is breakfast cereals which are teeming with sugar, as are soft drinks.
One big food con is breakfast cereals which are teeming with sugar.
All chubsters are fat because they eat more calories than they expend. However, I think that the food industry and the quality of school dinners should share some of the blame when it comes to overweight kids.
Ridiculously simplistic to label people a bad parent just for kids being overweight. Life is too complex to stoop to these stupid generalisations, you can't just lump people into two categories (bad parent/good parent) and you especially can't based on a single factor.
Fair enough if a child is morbidly obese and at risk of health problems - that qualifies as neglect, but weight is not the be all and end all of life. Nobody is perfect and it's impossible to have knowledge of everything. If someone's kid is a bit fat but they are happy, loved and engaged by their parents then what's the issue?
Also I'd say that nutrition is a complex subject and not everyone is interested in cooking. The medical profession is generally terrible with nutritional advice and that filters down to the government, is it any wonder that people aren't very good at being healthy these days when processed junk is so cheap and easily accessible.
If you love you kids take some responsibility to ensure they have a healthy diet, if kids are fat there's a good chance they will stay fat.
Agree, Special K and Jordans country crisp are f***ing Satan as far as I'm concerned. That and milkshakes aimed at the school lunchbox.
IMHO wheat for breakfast is the worst thing you can have if you need to lose weight, yet it's the thing society has decided to give everyone!
How come there were only a couple of fat kids in each year in the 70's and 80's?
How come there were only a couple of fat kids in each year in the 70's and 80's?
because people were poorer, didnt eat so much and bearly snacked at all. because most the bad foods were there, just not consumed as much.
How come there were only a couple of fat kids in each year in the 70's and 80's?
How come there were only a couple of fat kids in each year in the 70's and 80's?
Weetabix.confusing... you know there's no wheat in cereals, its corn, oats and barley? so has society decided on toast? would have thought toast, or any other wheat based breakfast (muffins, crossiants, pancakes?), better than overprocessed cereals.
Well, for me in my village :
Very few were driven the 500 yards or so to school in a 4x4
'Games' was compulsory and a couple of times a week, and included cross country
After school we played football and cricket, or generally arsed about outside, no tv, xbox or pc
Bikes were our prized possessions and we spent ages on them
There weren't takeaway places selling shitty food very cheaply, you got a wholesome meal cooked at home (and had to eat your greens)
Fat kids were called 'fatty', not treated like poor luvvies with 'issues' (I should know)