BUTTERBALL
East Stand Brighton Boyz
Makes me laugh how they blame the environment agency for an act of god. All the dredging in the world would not have prevented the flooding.
There are lots of flood plains in the UK they are not underwater because they have proper flood defences and drainage. Langley is on a flood plain that is not flooded.
The Somerset levels are exceptional and always prone to flooding, the locals have been asking for years for further dredging and drainage, they knew this would happen one day but it fell on deaf ears and now they are paying the price. If any work should have been done and money spent it should have been there. Ok we have had exceptional rainfall and the levels would have flooded but not to this extent.
The only people to blame are the EA and successive governments as usual. Its all about not wanting to spend money and not listening to the locals
There are lots of flood plains in the UK they are not underwater because they have proper flood defences and drainage. Langley is on a flood plain that is not flooded.
barking up the wrong trees there. this is a argricultural area that wouldnt have any substantial forestry. no has it been developed much if at all. its a low lying flood plain thats used to regular flooding that has experienced near 6 weeks of continuous rain. no dredging or fannying around with ditches would have changed this outcome.
really cant compare, we've not had anywhere near the same amount of rain in sussex, and the geography is quite different. Langley is a marsh, prone to flod from the sea, there's no substantial watercourses.
Why is this so hard to understand?
It's not the government or Environment agency fault.
Deforestation affects the whole of the UK. Flood plain, farmland or housing estate. It's a common misconception that it only affects the area the trees once were.
Dredging in that area of the country is only going to make all the water drain faster into someone elses house the next village/town/county over. This is the worse consecutive downpour of rainfall since records began 250 years ago. This is in no way the EA or governments fault.
what, even when the deforestation is hundreds of miles away? of course not. my point was, the affected area is lowlands that have been grassland and arable for centuries. (no doubt once where forested if we want to be pedantic). as far as i know there arent large tracts of forests upstream in the moors either.
But if you are rich and have a 4x4 then of course it's someone elses fault......."How dare anyone let nature come to my doorstep! I chose this house on postcode, size, and price, and didn't think once about nearby rivers linked to the atlantic - that's the goverment's job!"
Why is this so hard to understand?
It's not the government or Environment agency fault.
I don't think people are blaming the the government or EA for the rain, but maybe think they could do more to help with prevention and support. This sounds entirely reasonable to me and it seems pretty mean-spirited to attack those in trouble for thinking they should get better support.
Good job we don't live on a fault line. But presumably those guys should complain when they are in an earthquake.
Its not rocket science. buy a house half way up a hill or on the top. water runs downhill.