Nowt to do with corporations cutting hundreds of acres of trees down to build out of town Superstore's and crappy new builds. Certainly not that at all. How could cutting down trees that each process roughly 60 Gallons of water a day affect the run off?
It's hardly the fault of corporations... The environment agency needs to say no to building in these areas - not rely on Tesco's to make the call for them
Nowt to do with corporations cutting hundreds of acres of trees down to build out of town Superstore's and crappy new builds. Certainly not that at all. How could cutting down trees that each process roughly 60 Gallons of water a day affect the run off?
Why is this so hard to understand?
It's not the government or Environment agency fault.
It's hardly the fault of corporations... The environment agency needs to say no to building in these areas - not rely on Tesco's to make the call for them
Nowt to do with corporations cutting hundreds of acres of trees down to build out of town Superstore's and crappy new builds. Certainly not that at all. How could cutting down trees that each process roughly 60 Gallons of water a day affect the run off?
Was/is the A23 on a flood plain (Handcross area)? Genuine question
The area between Pitts Head Junction and the Slaugham junction crosses the Upper Ouse.
There are lots of flood plains in the UK they are not underwater because they have proper flood defences and drainage. Langley is on a flood plain that is not flooded.
The Somerset levels are exceptional and always prone to flooding, the locals have been asking for years for further dredging and drainage, they knew this would happen one day but it fell on deaf ears and now they are paying the price. If any work should have been done and money spent it should have been there. Ok we have had exceptional rainfall and the levels would have flooded but not to this extent.
The only people to blame are the EA and successive governments as usual. Its all about not wanting to spend money and not listening to the locals