Gazwag
5 millionth post poster
I'm not sure we would still be a league club or we might be skirting around leagues 1 & 2 with crowds of 6,000-8,000.
I doubt that we would be at the Amex/Falmer. If we still had the Goldstone there is no way we would have had the support of the council to move to a new site. In fact probably the opposite - a case of you have a home, upgrade it.
[QUOzTE=bhafc99;9225088]I know this kind of defeats your question, but if the Goldstone hadn't been ripped away from us, I think we'd now be at the Amex.
We just wouldn't have had the Gillingham and Withdean years in between.
In c1978 the club produced plans to improve the Goldstone - they were on display at Hove town hall for the public to view them. It comprised of (if my memory serves me well!) the West Stand being extended to the North Stand. The North Stand being rebuilt with executive boxes above the terracing. A roof being built over the East terrace. The capacity to be limited to 28,000.
The plan to share a stadium with Palace at Gatwick was just pie in the sky and never took off. ‘Scuse the pun! I must admit I never heard of a Waterhall development during the Bamber years - it might have worked back then.
I doubt that we would be at the Amex/Falmer. If we still had the Goldstone there is no way we would have had the support of the council to move to a new site. In fact probably the opposite - a case of you have a home, upgrade it..
In the Bamber era, wasn’t there was also the first proposal for a move to the quarries between Shoreham and Upper Beeding?
If we still played at the Goldstone I would be surprised if TB had taken over since there would be little chance of progression.
I guess we would be, at best mid Championship, probably Div 1. Our heroes on the pitch would be mix of free transferees , young loanees from bigger clubs and one or two foreigners who could not play at a higher level..
And you know? We would still be having great joy following the Albion
I doubt that we would be at the Amex/Falmer. If we still had the Goldstone there is no way we would have had the support of the council to move to a new site. In fact probably the opposite - a case of you have a home, upgrade it.
Definitely this. We only narrowly got the Amex, thank you John Prescott. Our main argument would not have existed.
There's quite a few roads within 10 minutes walk of Goldstone site that don't have parking restrictions on. Guess it depends how fast you walk! Head north or northwest of there. Like someone else pointed out there'd be special football parking restrictions anyway.
In c1978 the club produced plans to improve the Goldstone - they were on display at Hove town hall for the public to view them. It comprised of (if my memory serves me well!) the West Stand being extended to the North Stand. The North Stand being rebuilt with executive boxes above the terracing. A roof being built over the East terrace. The capacity to be limited to 28,000.
The plan to share a stadium with Palace at Gatwick was just pie in the sky and never took off. ‘Scuse the pun! I must admit I never heard of a Waterhall development during the Bamber years - it might have worked back then.
I was about to say the same. Perversely, it was the los of the Goldstone and the years in exile that persuaded the local council to even consider a project at Falmer or anywhere similar. Had we stayed at the Goldstone, I fear, without the stark decisions that were required, we'd still be there, with a max capacity of about 15k.
There's quite a few roads within 10 minutes walk of Goldstone site that don't have parking restrictions on. Guess it depends how fast you walk! Head north or northwest of there. Like someone else pointed out there'd be special football parking restrictions anyway.
There was a covenant covering the whole ground. No building higher than west stand
For those thinking the Goldstone could have been significantly expanded, here are satellite images at the same magnification:
View attachment 119607
View attachment 119608