brightonmark1234
Well-known member
i would rather the new manager brought in his own number 2 as i think its time for nathan jones to goEven if we bought a new manger in he'll have to work with Jones.
i would rather the new manager brought in his own number 2 as i think its time for nathan jones to goEven if we bought a new manger in he'll have to work with Jones.
The time for sacking Sami is long past.
It seems he is immune from the boot.
Because there's not an unlimited amount of games in a season and points available, so writing off games that haven't happened yet when you are in the situation we are in seems like a dangerous and overly fatalistic thing to do. Because new managers, or the sacking of a manager sometimes has an immediate effect. Because Derby are not infallible or unstoppable, but it would essentially be a free game as no one would criticise a new manager overly (or care about a caretaker) if we lost.What would be the point of sacking someone ahead of the Derby game. A new man, if indeed you already had one, would be in for a baptism of fire.If you had already made your mind up, why not let the game play out knowing a defeat would make your decision look more rational, and give your new man the comfort of an easier first game?The risk with this approach is, of course, that we get an unexpected victory.Just to be clear: I'm hypothesising here.