Reckon he won't serve the full sentence though
Reckon he won't serve the full sentence though
I've kind of followed this (as a mate is a sheff united fan and he has been shitting himself about this) but I don;t quite get how 1 is guilty and the other isn't?
Ched 'joined in' after Mcdonald had already been with the said girl.
If it was only ched being accused then it would make sense...but they were BOTH accused.
My head hurts
I've kind of followed this (as a mate is a sheff united fan and he has been shitting himself about this) but I don;t quite get how 1 is guilty and the other isn't?
Ched 'joined in' after Mcdonald had already been with the said girl.
If it was only ched being accused then it would make sense...but they were BOTH accused.
My head hurts
Perhaps the girl consented to McDonald but not Evans?
There's probably plenty that the jury have see that we haven't, but perhaps they decided there was some kind of implied consent from her conduct when she went into the room with McDonald.
Either way. If she didn't consent at any point then Evans committed an offence, as clearly the jury believe, and he deserves whatever the judge deems fit as a punishment.
Clayton McDonald cleared of the charge.
That is the part I don't get.
From what I'd read about the case, both men admitted to having sex with the woman, but claimed it was consensual, while she said she had no recollection of how she'd got to the hotel she woke up in.
Someone's definitely lying, as they have suggested she was completely 100% with it, and clearly consented.