Lord Bracknell
On fire
Are you the same source as the rumour that the decision would be announced on the Monday of the Labour Party Conference?pigin stripes said:Believe me ...
Are you the same source as the rumour that the decision would be announced on the Monday of the Labour Party Conference?pigin stripes said:Believe me ...
So, the club knows, and the answer is "NO", but still we get a story on the web site about Jakey wanting to be the first person to score at Falmer.....I'm pretty sure that if "the club" is in the know, that would include Paul C, and why would he write that if the decision was a No ?pigin stripes said:For those who want to listen the answer has been sent to the club, several days ago. My understanding from those who know and I am led to believe only the main 3 persons involved know the result is being delayed for 28 days until its made public.
A official response is to be made by a firm of solicitors acting for JP. on the 25/10/05.
NO I don't know the result however from what I have been told I believe its a NO, but with a yes for Sheepcote.
Exactly what I thought,do you remember that sour faced old testicle Cutress crowing with her glass of asti?hope she che chokes on it,As Terry Garrogan once said"theres f*** all jam in a Forfars doughnut"Yorkie said:I love the fact that there are 3 main persons involved.
Who are these 3 main persons?
The parties involved are Lewis Council, Falmer Parish Council, Brighton and Hove council, the club solicitors, Lord B, the Regency society, Sussex Downsman etc etc etc all of whom would be sent a copy of the decision at the same time.
Who would want to keep their mouths shut?
Lewes? I doubt it. Falmer residents? Last time when they thought they had won they couldn't wait to uncork the champagne and inform SCR even though they had misread the information.
s.stubbs said:Exactly what I thought,do you remember that sour faced old testicle Cutress crowing with her glass of asti?hope she che chokes on it,As Terry Garrogan once said"theres f*** all jam in a Forfars doughnut"
3gulls said:We will be told to of another suitable site. Cannot lose!
3gulls said:We will be told to of another suitable site. Cannot lose!
The Auditor said:yes ...but.....extra planning and design costs if a No to Falmer
clapham_gull said:I'm not sure that's technically correct.
Prescott is still only saying yes or no to Falmer. Whilst he may suggest another site is suitable, he could feasibly say that no sites are suitable.
3gulls said:I thought it was only a hunt for a better stadium, and that if none is found, he is ok to say yes to Falmer?
clapham_gull said:Point I'm making is that it isn't Prescott's remit to find us a site for the stadium if he says no the Falmer.
Although he may point out that another appears more suitable.
That's not a rubber stamp to build a stadium somewhere else is it ?
Am I mistaken ?
e77 said:Correct me if I am wrong but Prescott has already agreed that the city needs a new stadium, we 'simply' have to prove Falmer is the best site.
Cutting through the spin, are any of the other sites a serious option ?
WATFORD zero said:Now i can't say too much but
when i was having dinner with JP last night he told me that not only is he going to give us Falmer