Or greater use of the dark arts of defending ?
How often does the shirt tugging / grappling actually get punished by a penalty ?
It’s been said elsewhere, We do need to get a bit more savvy on these game management tactics
No surprises. Lack of physical presence from defenders and keeper. We need to convert more of our chances so we can win every game 3-2.
I would have thought it to have been a good idea to have played Burn knowing how tall and dangerous Vestergaard would be especially with Ward-prowse set pieces.
You can't do that in VAR world. If Veltman grabs Verstergaards shirt as he's sprinting forward and he goes down it's a penalty all day long.
No surprises. Lack of physical presence from defenders and keeper. We need to convert more of our chances so we can win every game 3-2.
If every situation could be defended against there would be no goals in football at all. Yes it's right to review every goal conceded and work to improve how we defend it, but its not right to use every goal conceded as another reason to bash our team and coaches.
That goal didn't happen because of basic defensive errors, it happened because of brilliant movement by Vestergaard and a pinpoint cross that couldn't have been any better. He backed off taking Veltman with him, then sprinted forward to where the cross was planned. Absolutely impossible for Veltman to stay with him unless he was guessing and leaving Vestergaard alone in order to get to that spot first. Dunk did very well to get there but stopping that goal would have required a mistake in the cross or header or a lucky gamble by one of our players.
No surprises. Lack of physical presence from defenders and keeper. We need to convert more of our chances so we can win every game 3-2.
I get your point and it was undoubtedly a good header. However, it was preventible.
Also, we can't say 'we only conceded because of brilliant movement and a pinpoint cross'. It's the Premier League, that should be expected.
Yes, to be worked on, and yes, I'm not saying there isn't an underlying issue at set pieces. But for me that goal was the set piece equivalent of a 30 yard screamer into the top corner and we wouldn't get pages of self flagellation about those. That's all really.
I think our players are so fearful of conceding VAR penalties from set pieces that they won’t apply the Dark Arts of defending, which in the past would’ve meant someone checking Vestegard in his run.
That and Duffy used to win at least 50% of our defensive headers from set pieces.
I don’t remember it ever being an issue under Hughton in the same way it so clearly is now.
100%- I said to my son when they got the corner that it would be just like us to concede straight after scoring. For all of the height at the back none of our centre halfs are that commanding in the air.
I also hate zonal marking.
Funny you mentioned this, I’m pretty sure our record at defending set plays was equally as bad with Duffy and Murray in the side. Both seen as better in the air than our current lot. Murray was certainly better at defending corners than our current bunch. I don’t think physical presence alone is at fault, but certainly not helping the situation.
Not sure how you can compare a preventable goal to a unpreventable goal and also, if we were conceding a lot of 30 yard screamers, we would say 'we should start closing the opposition down' rather than just accepting the pattern.
I'm a big fan of bullet headers from giant defenders
Preferably for, rather than against us, of course
I'm a big fan of bullet headers from giant defenders
Preferably for, rather than against us, of course
I'm a big fan of bullet headers from giant defenders
Preferably for, rather than against us, of course