Billy the Fish
Technocrat
Whatever the issue, some complete .**** always tries to blame Thatchernobody's dupe said:Typical of Thatchers children.
Whatever the issue, some complete .**** always tries to blame Thatchernobody's dupe said:Typical of Thatchers children.
Billy the Fish said:Whatever the issue, some complete .**** always tries to blame Thatcher
nobody's dupe said:You silly, stupid, pathetic young person. Typical of Thatchers children. Do what I like; Say what I like; How I bloody like and To hell with who gets in the way. NUMBER ONE FIRST AND LAST AT ALL TIMES!
You dare to gloss over "their recent tragedies." You stupid bitch. It's obvious if those same tragedies happened to you, you would go under.
So when you went in to the shop instead of treating you like Lady Muck they treated you like the common little upstart that you are. You've had a chip on your shoulder ever since. I don't visit this board very often, but when I do you seem to always be relating to it.
Well let me tell you that you were never treated badly by either Julie or Pat.
They were two members of the shop staff who were sought out by customers because they gave such good service. Their sackings under the guise of redundancies have nothing to do with cost-cutting. Instead, an employee has got his/her way at the club for the umpteenth time because Julie and Pat dared to cross him/her. This action has gone back to the days of Bellotti.
nobody's dupe said:
Well let me tell you that you were never treated badly by either Julie or Pat.
They were two members of the shop staff who were sought out by customers because they gave such good service. Their sackings under the guise of redundancies have nothing to do with cost-cutting. Instead, an employee has got his/her way at the club for the umpteenth time because Julie and Pat dared to cross him/her. This action has gone back to the days of Bellotti.
nobody's dupe said:
Instead, an employee has got his/her way at the club for the umpteenth time because Julie and Pat dared to cross him/her. This action has gone back to the days of Bellotti.
It does - because that fair point could so easily have been lost amongst the rest of an uncalled for and shameful tirade of abuse.Yorkie said:This bears repeating.
I'm not going to get involved in the wider debate, other than to blame Callaghan, rather than Thatcher - in this case.nobody's dupe said:You silly, stupid, pathetic young person. Typical of Thatchers children.
Marc said:
If someone or two people have been made redundant then lets hope they get two people in with common customer service skills at least.
Yorkie said:This bears repeating.
Tight shorts said:Your post is out of order and spiteful. You may have had a good point to make but why be so vindictive and nasty? Be ashamed of yourself.
Quite. Lush isn't young at all.Tight shorts said:Your post is out of order and spiteful. You may have had a good point to make but why be so vindictive and nasty? Be ashamed of yourself.
Yorkie said:If someone gets made redundant it is because that job is no longer available to any workforce. That is employment law.
If someone is made redundant and then someone else is employed to do the same job, then the original person has every right to sue for unfair dismissal.
roz said:Actually, I don't think it does. Mainly because it just adds to the "I know something you don't, so there!" tone of things and simply spreads yet more unhelpful and unsubstantiated rumours about the alleged facts.
Lord Bracknell said:I'm not going to get involved in the wider debate, other than to blame Callaghan, rather than Thatcher - in this case.
And that's not something I do very often.