This was kind of the point of the thread. To see whether some would jump for Mitro without having even seen Andone.
The majority would.
I wouldn't and that's all that counts.
This was kind of the point of the thread. To see whether some would jump for Mitro without having even seen Andone.
The majority would.
I'm a "no".
There's only so many tens of millions we can spend bringing in strikers who sit around doing nothing until Sir Glenn decides he wants to retire, and we've probably reached that limit already.
I'm a "no".
There's only so many tens of millions we can spend bringing in strikers who sit around doing nothing until Sir Glenn decides he wants to retire, and we've probably reached that limit already.
We are allowed to offload players too, though. Recoup half of the Locadia money selling him back to the Dutch league, and get a striker in.
If he is a **** then I agree with you. Is he though? What evidence is there?
Neither would go to Fulham and the club wouldn’t sell to Fulham.I think the more likely outcome will be Fulham putting in a bid for Dunk/Duffy!
They can score goals but need to shore up their defense and balance their open but a little too open play with a throw-their-bodies-on-the-line defense that will stop them leaking goals faster than they can score them.
Rather than, arrogantly believe we can poach their talisman we should be ensuring we remain #together.
Deluded if you think Fulham would sell in January. I doubt they'd even sell him next Summer presume he has a long contract, is already on Premier League wages + he'd be key to ensuring Fulham came back up
Would you?
Which came first?I’ve just been reading a few articles on some of Newcastle’s fans’ forums regarding Mitrovic. The concensus seems that, although talented, his attitude leaves a lot to be desired. It seems that he constantly boils over when things don’t go his way, on the field he has been known for committing some horrendous fouls resulting in him receiving red/yellow cards and subsequent suspensions. Benitez was always reluctant to play him - therein lies evidence of his (Mitrovic) liability. So the expressions loose cannon and hot head spring to mind. Hardly a vital cog that would slip easily into Chris Hughton’s well oiled machinery of team togetherness.
Murray is in as good a nick physically as I've ever seen him in his career - I think there's another season in him, maybe even a couple. His game isn't about pace, never was, and he seems to be steering clear of injuries, he's clearly looking after himself.
Personally I don't think a Murray replacement even needs to be on the agenda at the moment. Forget Mitrovic, we should be giving Glenn another year, maybe two.
Which came first?
The Geordies are far to myopic to see fault with Benitez, but he has more of a history of falling out with players, than Mitrovic has of being a dickhead.
One of NSC's greatest living posters said, back in the summer:-
'If this team is reliant on Murray for goals, it's sure to be relegated'.
and I stand by that.
#neverwrong
Oh goody. Another poll.
Which came first?
The Geordies are far to myopic to see fault with Benitez, but he has more of a history of falling out with players, than Mitrovic has of being a dickhead.