The Clamp
Well-known member
The whole thing seems seedy and unethical. From both sides.
The blokes in hospital, not in hiding, doesn't sound in a fit state to come out fighting.If I had been accused of the alleged allegations I would come out fighting from the get go if I knew it was pure fabrication. Hand my phone to police with password for examination hire a decent lawyer and not go into hiding. None of that happened with Edwards so who knows what the truth is.
However, the 'me too' contingent have woken up. Apparently he looked at someone in a funny way that made someone feel uncomfortable. Someone recalls in leisurely hindsight.The police don’t appear to think that evidence exists. It has run its course.
Yes but it is the cant, hypocrisy and the hounding of easy targets that is the hallmark of the Sun that is under the microscope here. If the 'many' to which you refer is the Sun, I agree.truth of the matter is that i doubt there’s a person breathing who hasn’t done/said something in their past that wasn’t inappropriate etc. Shame many don’t dwell on that though before they let the hounds out.
i wouldn’t have a clue. Couldn’t care if they were, labour, liberal, green, SNP, whatever. Everyone has the right to be investigated not hounded. Or should i conclude from your post you couldn’t give a stuff, if they were to be tory then they should be classified guilty, innocent or not.your post leads me to conclude that most of them are tories, is that correct?
And The Sun has knowingly published pictures of 16 years olds with their kit off for people to wank over (as shown on the other thread). The irony....So he whacks off to pictures of a seventeen year old…. Is that it ?
Based upon the new "revelations" this morning, he chats to young people on Instagram and sends them heart emojis.So he whacks off to pictures of a seventeen year old…. Is that it ?
Disgusting behaviour and I for one am glad that the Street of Shame is highlighting such disgusting behaviourSo he whacks off to pictures of a seventeen year old…. Is that it ?
Samantha Fox was 16 when The Sun stuck her topless pics on Page 3.Every mention of the ‘alleged victim’ in that scum rag labels the person in their early 20’s as a ‘child’ or ‘youngster’. It’s absolutely abhorrent, especially as the person in question has called out the story as BS.
Are they alleged allegations, or just allegations, or somebody alleging that there are allegations?If I had been accused of the alleged allegations I would come out fighting from the get go if I knew it was pure fabrication.
The "celebrity" are getting too much mefia status.Putting The Sun to one side, filthy rag.
The BBC have reopened the investigation into Huw Edwards and are exploring claims by several staff at BBC that have made accusations of threatening and unpleasant correspondence regarding this kind of behaviour.
That’s my understanding of what was reported in the R4 news just now.
quick fact check. They haven’t been paid anything by the sunI guess the parents have made £££'s from The S*n through all this though. So, y'know. Every cloud.