vegster
Sanity Clause
- May 5, 2008
- 28,272
And you went out to watch it ?
No, was strolling with Mrs V near the Pier when they went by, a genuinely sad sight.
And you went out to watch it ?
Ok then minimal testing.
Footballers are rarely tested.
Most are not even tested once a season.
At this years Giro d'italia the full Movistar team was randomly tested one morning.
Then randomly tested again in the afternoon.
That is 18 blood and urine tests on one team in one day.
The FA don't carry that many out in a month, and if they did they would only be urine tests, which even I could manipulate.
By the way, all clean.
Ok then minimal testing.
Footballers are rarely tested.
Most are not even tested once a season.
At this years Giro d'italia the full Movistar team was randomly tested one morning.
Then randomly tested again in the afternoon.
That is 18 blood and urine tests on one team in one day.
The FA don't carry that many out in a month, and if they did they would only be urine tests, which even I could manipulate.
By the way, all clean.
Football is largely decided by skill.
Cycling is decided by endurance and power.
Drugs can never enhance skill.
Premier world sporting event? Riding a bike!? Lol
Very true.Not much use when the testing doesn't keep up with the drugs being used, as we've seen time and time again.
Skill is only part of the game.
Endurance, stamina, speed and in tournament football recovery all play a part.
I'm Mr Doctor.
I can guarantee your team will play longer and faster than their opponents, and recover quicker.
I can guarantee they will train harder for longer and recover quick.
I can guarantee they will also recover quicker from injury.
I have all of this proof collated from a 'third world' sport with minimal prize money.
Can I interest you in taking your club, (or keeping your club) at the top table of a multi billion dollar sporting empire?
Oh and do you want to know the best bit:-
They won't even check to see if your cheating.
Easy you're dangerously close to saying:-
No drug can make you kick a ball straight, which is the hallowed ground being saved for Robbie Savage.
Which is exactly why cycling was/is used and abused.I'm not saying there'd be no advantage for a footballer to be drugged up to the eyeballs to enhance and aid his stamina. But there is a starker advantage to a cyclist.
1. Its an individual sport.
2. There is little skill involved in cycling.
Cycling is PRIMARILY about strength and endurance. Not skill. Yes there are tactics, yes there is timing. But essentially, you point the bike and you peddle like fack. And if you've take lots of drugs, you have an an excellent chance of improving your lot.
Thats not quite the case with soccerball. The team aspect dilutes the potential of a warped result, and the skill/endurance ratio is a FAR tighter equation than it is in cycling.
I'm not saying there'd be no advantage for a footballer to be drugged up to the eyeballs to enhance and aid his stamina. But there is a starker advantage to a cyclist.
1. Its an individual sport.
2. There is little skill involved in cycling.
Cycling is PRIMARILY about strength and endurance. Not skill. Yes there are tactics, yes there is timing. But essentially, you point the bike and you peddle like fack. And if you've take lots of drugs, you have an an excellent chance of improving your lot.
Thats not quite the case with soccerball. The team aspect dilutes the potential of a warped result, and the skill/endurance ratio is a FAR tighter equation than it is in cycling.
I see the point of your discussion, drug taking generally enhances individual performance in sport, notably among cyclists, athletics sprinters, weightlifters and swimmers.
Cycling is not quite as clear cut as you suggest. Yes, there are individual road and track cycling events - but the majority are team races, ok it will end up with an individual winner but invariably participating teams will indulge in a very complicated tactical game of 'chess' to get the individual winner across the finish line. On the TdF just watch how for example the 9 man Sky team is primarily geared up to get Froome into the yellow jersey, and maybe keep Porte up there too in case Froome goes down. They may let other team members win stages but invariably that is to protect the team leader. The team will be composed of riders selected for not only endurance but also climbing, sprinting and time trialling. There have been examples of team management secretly doping the whole team.
PED use is a lot more sophisticated that 'the winner is the person who came get the most 'roids into their arm'.I'm not disagreeing with that.
But that fact remains that even with the team aspect, cycling is still primarliy a test of flat-out endurance. Football is not. Sure there are advantges to a team that can run and run and run for 90 minutes...but put Stoke City up against Barcelona and 99 times out of 100 there would still only be one winner, even if the Stokies are cracked up to eye-bulging, vein-straining, temple-pulsing Jodie Marsh proportions.
In football, skill will prevail. Cycling has no skill, therefore drugs will be the decider.