Uncle Spielberg
Well-known member
You assume it is all planned with meticulous detail but it might be completely disorganised and shambolic for all any of us knows.
You assume it is all planned with meticulous detail but it might be completely disorganised and shambolic for all any of us knows.
Yes I'm sure it is. Despite the rest of the club clearly being run with some of the best organisation and professionalism we've ever seen, when it comes to scouting and transfers we just throw it all out the window.
No he isnt,.. he is a slightly withdrawn striker in a free role.... but dont let the facts get in the way of your anti CMS sentiment eh?Barnes is playing in midfield, and he still gets more than CMS!
No he isnt,.. he is a slightly withdrawn striker in a free role.... but dont let the facts get in the way of your anti CMS sentiment eh?
Id say striker in a free role.... where do we go with this now then?I'd say midfield.
Id say striker in a free role.... where do we go with this now then?
I'd say midfield.
So would I, but then, I don't have an anti-barnes sentiment.
...but if I think he is not 'all that'..... surely I am allowed to air that view!!So would I, but then, I don't have an anti-barnes sentiment.
...but if I think he is not 'all that'..... surely I am allowed to air that view!!
...but if I think he is not 'all that'..... surely I am allowed to air that view!!
...but if I think he is not 'all that'..... surely I am allowed to air that view!!
how many did we take yesterday?
i didnt see it mentioned anywhere and wasn't on either site
Sorry, I assumed this was a rhetorical question...... if he was midfield he would be consistently tracking back to pick up the ball from the defence,.... this he doesnt do does he,... he is mostly receiving the ball in an advanced position from the other midfield/wide players..... thus leading me to the conclusion that he is a forward.... simplistic, but I find that works on NSC.You said withdrawn striker. How withdrawn does striker have to be to make him a midfielder?